Filtered by vendor Liblnk Project
Subscribe
Total
5 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-17264 | 1 Liblnk Project | 1 Liblnk | 2021-07-21 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
** DISPUTED ** In libyal liblnk before 20191006, liblnk_location_information_read_data in liblnk_location_information.c has a heap-based buffer over-read because an incorrect variable name is used for a certain offset. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in the GitHub issue. | |||||
CVE-2019-17401 | 1 Liblnk Project | 1 Liblnk | 2019-10-11 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
** DISPUTED ** libyal liblnk 20191006 has a heap-based buffer over-read in the network_share_name_offset>20 code block of liblnk_location_information_read_data in liblnk_location_information.c, a different issue than CVE-2019-17264. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in the GitHub issue. | |||||
CVE-2018-12097 | 1 Liblnk Project | 1 Liblnk | 2018-08-31 | 1.9 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
** DISPUTED ** The liblnk_location_information_read_data function in liblnk_location_information.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub. | |||||
CVE-2018-12098 | 1 Liblnk Project | 1 Liblnk | 2018-08-31 | 1.9 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
** DISPUTED ** The liblnk_data_block_read function in liblnk_data_block.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub. | |||||
CVE-2018-12096 | 1 Liblnk Project | 1 Liblnk | 2018-08-31 | 1.9 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
** DISPUTED ** The liblnk_data_string_get_utf8_string_size function in liblnk_data_string.c in liblnk through 2018-04-19 allows remote attackers to cause an information disclosure (heap-based buffer over-read) via a crafted lnk file. NOTE: the vendor has disputed this as described in libyal/liblnk issue 33 on GitHub. |