Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Join the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) community and start to get notified about new vulnerabilities.

Filtered by vendor Jtekt Subscribe
Filtered by product Nano Cpu Tuc-6941
Total 3 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2022-29958 1 Jtekt 34 Nano 10gx Tuc-1157, Nano 10gx Tuc-1157 Firmware, Nano Cpu Tuc-6941 and 31 more 2022-08-03 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
JTEKT TOYOPUC PLCs through 2022-04-29 do not ensure data integrity. They utilize the unauthenticated CMPLink/TCP protocol for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the PLC. Control logic is downloaded to the PLC on a block-by-block basis with a given memory address and a blob of machine code. The logic that is downloaded to the PLC is not cryptographically authenticated, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary machine code on the PLC's CPU module in the context of the runtime. In the case of the PC10G-CPU, and likely for other CPU modules of the TOYOPUC family, a processor without MPU or MMU is used and this no memory protection or privilege-separation capabilities are available, giving an attacker full control over the CPU.
CVE-2022-29951 1 Jtekt 34 Nano 10gx Tuc-1157, Nano 10gx Tuc-1157 Firmware, Nano Cpu Tuc-6941 and 31 more 2022-08-02 N/A 9.1 CRITICAL
JTEKT TOYOPUC PLCs through 2022-04-29 mishandle authentication. They utilize the CMPLink/TCP protocol (configurable on ports 1024-65534 on either TCP or UDP) for a wide variety of engineering purposes such as starting and stopping the PLC, downloading and uploading projects, and changing configuration settings. This protocol does not have any authentication features, allowing any attacker capable of communicating with the port in question to invoke (a subset of) desired functionality.
CVE-2021-33011 1 Jtekt 54 2port-efr Thu-6404, 2port-efr Thu-6404 Firmware, Ef10 Tcu-6982 and 51 more 2021-09-23 3.3 LOW 4.3 MEDIUM
All versions of the afffected TOYOPUC-PC10 Series,TOYOPUC-Plus Series,TOYOPUC-PC3J/PC2J Series, TOYOPUC-Nano Series products may not be able to properly process an ICMP flood, which may allow an attacker to deny Ethernet communications between affected devices.