Filtered by vendor Ecryptfs
Subscribe
Total
12 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-1572 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Ecryptfs and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Ecryptfs-utils and 3 more | 2022-03-23 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 8.4 HIGH |
mount.ecryptfs_private.c in eCryptfs-utils does not validate mount destination filesystem types, which allows local users to gain privileges by mounting over a nonstandard filesystem, as demonstrated by /proc/$pid. | |||||
CVE-2012-3409 | 2 Debian, Ecryptfs | 2 Debian Linux, Ecryptfs-utils | 2020-01-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
ecryptfs-utils: suid helper does not restrict mounting filesystems with nosuid,nodev which creates a possible privilege escalation | |||||
CVE-2008-5188 | 1 Ecryptfs | 1 Ecryptfs Utils | 2017-09-28 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
The (1) ecryptfs-setup-private, (2) ecryptfs-setup-confidential, and (3) ecryptfs-setup-pam-wrapped.sh scripts in ecryptfs-utils 45 through 61 in eCryptfs place cleartext passwords on command lines, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by listing the process. | |||||
CVE-2016-6224 | 2 Canonical, Ecryptfs | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Ecryptfs-utils | 2017-08-07 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
ecryptfs-setup-swap in eCryptfs does not prevent the unencrypted swap partition from activating during boot when using GPT partitioning on a (1) NVMe or (2) MMC drive, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-8946. | |||||
CVE-2014-9687 | 1 Ecryptfs | 1 Ecryptfs-utils | 2016-12-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
eCryptfs 104 and earlier uses a default salt to encrypt the mount passphrase, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain user passwords via a brute force attack. | |||||
CVE-2015-8946 | 2 Canonical, Ecryptfs | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Ecryptfs-utils | 2016-07-27 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
ecryptfs-setup-swap in eCryptfs before 111 does not prevent the unencrypted swap partition from activating during boot when using GPT partitioning and certain versions of systemd, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | |||||
CVE-2011-1837 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 3.6 LOW | N/A |
The lock-counter implementation in utils/mount.ecryptfs_private.c in ecryptfs-utils before 90 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | |||||
CVE-2011-1832 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
utils/mount.ecryptfs_private.c in ecryptfs-utils before 90 does not properly check mountpoint permissions, which allows local users to remove directories via a umount system call. | |||||
CVE-2011-1834 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
utils/mount.ecryptfs_private.c in ecryptfs-utils before 90 does not properly maintain the mtab file during error conditions, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (table corruption) or bypass intended unmounting restrictions via a umount system call. | |||||
CVE-2011-1831 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
utils/mount.ecryptfs_private.c in ecryptfs-utils before 90 does not properly check mountpoint permissions, which allows local users to effectively replace any directory with a new filesystem, and consequently gain privileges, via a mount system call. | |||||
CVE-2011-1835 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 4.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
The encrypted private-directory setup process in utils/ecryptfs-setup-private in ecryptfs-utils before 90 does not properly ensure that the passphrase file is created, which might allow local users to bypass intended access restrictions at a certain time in the new-user creation steps. | |||||
CVE-2011-1836 | 1 Ecryptfs | 2 Ecryptfs-utils, Ecryptfs Utils | 2014-03-07 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
utils/ecryptfs-recover-private in ecryptfs-utils before 90 does not establish a subdirectory with safe permissions, which might allow local users to bypass intended access restrictions via standard filesystem operations during the recovery process. |