Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-46169 | 1 Cacti | 1 Cacti | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Cacti is an open source platform which provides a robust and extensible operational monitoring and fault management framework for users. In affected versions a command injection vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on a server running Cacti, if a specific data source was selected for any monitored device. The vulnerability resides in the `remote_agent.php` file. This file can be accessed without authentication. This function retrieves the IP address of the client via `get_client_addr` and resolves this IP address to the corresponding hostname via `gethostbyaddr`. After this, it is verified that an entry within the `poller` table exists, where the hostname corresponds to the resolved hostname. If such an entry was found, the function returns `true` and the client is authorized. This authorization can be bypassed due to the implementation of the `get_client_addr` function. The function is defined in the file `lib/functions.php` and checks serval `$_SERVER` variables to determine the IP address of the client. The variables beginning with `HTTP_` can be arbitrarily set by an attacker. Since there is a default entry in the `poller` table with the hostname of the server running Cacti, an attacker can bypass the authentication e.g. by providing the header `Forwarded-For: <TARGETIP>`. This way the function `get_client_addr` returns the IP address of the server running Cacti. The following call to `gethostbyaddr` will resolve this IP address to the hostname of the server, which will pass the `poller` hostname check because of the default entry. After the authorization of the `remote_agent.php` file is bypassed, an attacker can trigger different actions. One of these actions is called `polldata`. The called function `poll_for_data` retrieves a few request parameters and loads the corresponding `poller_item` entries from the database. If the `action` of a `poller_item` equals `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP`, the function `proc_open` is used to execute a PHP script. The attacker-controlled parameter `$poller_id` is retrieved via the function `get_nfilter_request_var`, which allows arbitrary strings. This variable is later inserted into the string passed to `proc_open`, which leads to a command injection vulnerability. By e.g. providing the `poller_id=;id` the `id` command is executed. In order to reach the vulnerable call, the attacker must provide a `host_id` and `local_data_id`, where the `action` of the corresponding `poller_item` is set to `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP`. Both of these ids (`host_id` and `local_data_id`) can easily be bruteforced. The only requirement is that a `poller_item` with an `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP` action exists. This is very likely on a productive instance because this action is added by some predefined templates like `Device - Uptime` or `Device - Polling Time`. This command injection vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands if a `poller_item` with the `action` type `POLLER_ACTION_SCRIPT_PHP` (`2`) is configured. The authorization bypass should be prevented by not allowing an attacker to make `get_client_addr` (file `lib/functions.php`) return an arbitrary IP address. This could be done by not honoring the `HTTP_...` `$_SERVER` variables. If these should be kept for compatibility reasons it should at least be prevented to fake the IP address of the server running Cacti. This vulnerability has been addressed in both the 1.2.x and 1.3.x release branches with `1.2.23` being the first release containing the patch. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45990 | 1 Ecommerce-website Project | 1 Ecommerce-website | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /signup_script.php of Ecommerce-Website v1.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the eMail parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45769 | 1 Clicshopping | 1 Clicshopping V3 | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ClicShopping_V3 v3.402 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted URL parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3909 | 1 Add Comments Project | 1 Add Comments | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The Add Comments WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | |||||
| CVE-2022-39384 | 1 Openzeppelin | 2 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Before version 4.4.1 but after 3.2.0, initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call. Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible in the scenario described above, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution. Note that upgradeable proxies are commonly initialized together with contract creation, where reentrancy is not feasible, so the impact of this issue is believed to be minor. This issue has been patched, please upgrade to version 4.4.1. As a workaround, avoid untrusted external calls during initialization. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35961 | 1 Openzeppelin | 2 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35916 | 1 Openzeppelin | 2 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Contracts using the cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2, `CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2` or `LibArbitrumL2`, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts (EOAs) as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35915 | 1 Openzeppelin | 4 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable, Openzeppelin-eth and 1 more | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The target contract of an EIP-165 `supportsInterface` query can cause unbounded gas consumption by returning a lot of data, while it is generally assumed that this operation has a bounded cost. The issue has been fixed in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31198 | 1 Openzeppelin | 2 Contracts, Contracts Upgradeable | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. This issue concerns instances of Governor that use the module `GovernorVotesQuorumFraction`, a mechanism that determines quorum requirements as a percentage of the voting token's total supply. In affected instances, when a proposal is passed to lower the quorum requirements, past proposals may become executable if they had been defeated only due to lack of quorum, and the number of votes it received meets the new quorum requirement. Analysis of instances on chain found only one proposal that met this condition, and we are actively monitoring for new occurrences of this particular issue. This issue has been patched in v4.7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should consider avoiding lowering quorum requirements if a past proposal was defeated for lack of quorum. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3907 | 1 Clerk | 1 Clerk.io | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Clerk WordPress plugin before 4.0.0 is affected by time-based attacks in the validation function for all API requests due to the usage of comparison operators to verify API keys against the ones stored in the site options. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23465 | 1 Swiftterm Project | 1 Swiftterm | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| SwiftTerm is a Xterm/VT100 Terminal emulator. Prior to commit a94e6b24d24ce9680ad79884992e1dff8e150a31, an attacker could modify the window title via a certain character escape sequence and then insert it back to the command line in the user's terminal, e.g. when the user views a file containing the malicious sequence, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands. Version a94e6b24d24ce9680ad79884992e1dff8e150a31 contains a patch for this issue. There are no known workarounds available. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3892 | 1 Wp-oauth | 1 Wp Oauth Server | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 4.2.2 does not sanitize and escape Client IDs, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) | |||||
| CVE-2022-3926 | 1 Wp-oauth | 1 Wp Oauth Server | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID | |||||
| CVE-2022-40265 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 12 R04encpu, R04encpu Firmware, R08encpu and 9 more | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series RJ71EN71 Firmware version "65" and prior and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R04/08/16/32/120ENCPU Network Part Firmware version "65" and prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition by sending specially crafted packets. A system reset is required for recovery. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46338 | 2 Debian, G810-led Project | 2 Debian Linux, G810-led | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| g810-led 0.4.2, a LED configuration tool for Logitech Gx10 keyboards, contained a udev rule to make supported device nodes world-readable and writable, allowing any process on the system to read traffic from keyboards, including sensitive data. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32632 | 3 Google, Mediatek, Yoctoproject | 35 Android, Mt6580, Mt6735 and 32 more | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In Wi-Fi, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07441630; Issue ID: ALPS07441630. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32631 | 3 Google, Mediatek, Yoctoproject | 34 Android, Mt6580, Mt6739 and 31 more | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In Wi-Fi, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07453613; Issue ID: ALPS07453613. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3838 | 1 Wpupper Share Buttons Project | 1 Wpupper Share Buttons | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The WPUpper Share Buttons WordPress plugin through 3.42 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | |||||
| CVE-2022-32633 | 3 Google, Mediatek, Yoctoproject | 50 Android, Mt6580, Mt6739 and 47 more | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In Wi-Fi, there is a possible memory access violation due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07441637; Issue ID: ALPS07441637. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3830 | 1 Themeum | 1 Wp Page Builder | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The WP Page Builder WordPress plugin through 1.2.8 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | |||||