Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-13294 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2022-12-06 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In GitLab before 13.0.12, 13.1.6 and 13.2.3, access grants were not revoked when a user revoked access to an application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3712 | 7 Debian, Mcafee, Netapp and 4 more | 32 Debian Linux, Epolicy Orchestrator, Clustered Data Ontap and 29 more | 2022-12-06 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3711 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 31 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 28 more | 2022-12-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the "out" parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the "outlen" parameter is populated with the buffer size required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the "out" parameter. A bug in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2 content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). | |||||
| CVE-2018-3284 | 4 Canonical, Mariadb, Netapp and 1 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Mariadb, Active Iq Unified Manager and 4 more | 2022-12-06 | 3.5 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the MySQL Server component of Oracle MySQL (subcomponent: InnoDB). Supported versions that are affected are 5.7.23 and prior and 8.0.12 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 4.4 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2020-15783 | 1 Siemens | 24 Simatic S7-300 Cpu 312, Simatic S7-300 Cpu 312 Firmware, Simatic S7-300 Cpu 314 and 21 more | 2022-12-06 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC TDC CPU555 (All versions), SINUMERIK 840D sl (All versions). Sending multiple specially crafted packets to the affected devices could cause a Denial-of-Service on port 102. A cold restart is required to recover the service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27386 | 1 Flexdotnetcms Project | 1 Flexdotnetcms | 2022-12-06 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An unrestricted file upload issue in FlexDotnetCMS before v1.5.9 allows an authenticated remote attacker to upload and execute arbitrary files by using the FileManager to upload malicious code (e.g., ASP code) in the form of a safe file type (e.g., a TXT file), and then using the FileEditor (in v1.5.8 and prior) or the FileManager's rename function (in v1.5.7 and prior) to rename the file to an executable extension (e.g., ASP), and finally executing the file via an HTTP GET request to /<path_to_file>. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17566 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 18 Batik, Api Gateway, Business Intelligence and 15 more | 2022-12-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24379 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Yaws | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Yaws | 2022-12-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| WebDAV implementation in Yaws web server versions 1.81 to 2.0.7 is vulnerable to XXE injection. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4336 | 1 Ibm | 1 Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2022-12-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 161411. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4297 | 1 Ibm | 1 Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2022-12-06 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct an LDAP injection. By using a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to make unauthorized queries or modify the LDAP content. IBM X-Force ID: 160761. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4337 | 1 Ibm | 1 Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2022-12-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information due to missing authentication in Ignite nodes. IBM X-Force ID: 161412. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21944 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2022-12-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the TIFF parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer oveflow takes place trying to copy the first 12 bits from local variable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21945 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2022-12-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the TIFF parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer oveflow takes place trying to copy the second 12 bits from local variable. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21946 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2022-12-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the JPEG-JFIF lossless Huffman image parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer overflow takes place when the `SOF3` precision is lower than 9. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21947 | 1 Accusoft | 1 Imagegear | 2022-12-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Two heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exists in the JPEG-JFIF lossless Huffman image parser functionality of Accusoft ImageGear 19.10. A specially-crafted file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger these vulnerabilities.This heap-based buffer overflow takes place when the `SOF3` precision is greater or equal than 9. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24916 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Yaws | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Yaws | 2022-12-06 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| CGI implementation in Yaws web server versions 1.81 to 2.0.7 is vulnerable to OS command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3932 | 1 Crestron | 4 Am-100, Am-100 Firmware, Am-101 and 1 more | 2022-12-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Crestron AM-100 with firmware 1.6.0.2 and AM-101 with firmware 2.7.0.2 are vulnerable to authentication bypass due to a hard-coded password in return.tgi. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can use this vulnerability to control external devices via the uart_bridge. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35507 | 1 Proxmox | 3 Proxmox Mail Gateway, Pve Http Server, Virtual Environment | 2022-12-06 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A response-header CRLF injection vulnerability in the Proxmox Virtual Environment (PVE) and Proxmox Mail Gateway (PMG) web interface allows a remote attacker to set cookies for a victim's browser that are longer than the server expects, causing a client-side DoS. This affects Chromium-based browsers because they allow injection of response headers with %0d. This is fixed in pve-http-server 4.1-3. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3935 | 1 Crestron | 4 Am-100, Am-100 Firmware, Am-101 and 1 more | 2022-12-06 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Crestron AM-100 with firmware 1.6.0.2 and AM-101 with firmware 2.7.0.2 allows anyone to act as a moderator to a slide show via crafted HTTP POST requests to conference.cgi. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can use this vulnerability to start, stop, and disconnect active slideshows. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3939 | 1 Crestron | 4 Am-100, Am-100 Firmware, Am-101 and 1 more | 2022-12-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Crestron AM-100 with firmware 1.6.0.2 and AM-101 with firmware 2.7.0.2 use default credentials admin/admin and moderator/moderator for the web interface. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can use these credentials to gain privileged access to the device. | |||||