Total
210374 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-20008 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20007 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20006 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20005 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20004 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20003 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2021-20002 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2019-10942 | 1 Siemens | 6 Scalance X-200, Scalance X-200 Firmware, Scalance X-200irt and 3 more | 2022-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V5.2.5), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V5.5.0), SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR) (All versions), SCALANCE X204RNA (PRP) (All versions), SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (HSR) (All versions), SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP) (All versions), SCALANCE X204RNA EEC (PRP/HSR) (All versions). The device contains a vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trigger a denial-of-service condition by sending large message packages repeatedly to the telnet service. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with network access to the affected systems. Successful exploitation requires no system privileges and no user interaction. An attacker could use the vulnerability to compromise availability of the device. | |||||
CVE-2017-12741 | 1 Siemens | 76 Dk Standard Ethernet Controller, Dk Standard Ethernet Controller Firmware, Ek-ertec 200p and 73 more | 2022-02-09 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: DK Standard Ethernet Controller, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200P, SIMATIC Compact Field Unit, SIMATIC ET200AL, SIMATIC ET200M (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN BA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200S (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN BA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HS (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DO DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 4AO U/I 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DIO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DO, DC24V/2A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI; 4 U/I; 4 RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/0,5A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN: IO-Link Master, SIMATIC ET200pro, SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (incl. SIPLUS NET variants), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller, SIMATIC S7-200 SMART, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 H V6 CPU family and below (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 CPU family and below (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-410 V8 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC TDC CP51M1, SIMATIC TDC CPU555, SIMATIC WinAC RTX (F) 2010, SIMOCODE pro V EIP (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMOCODE pro V PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMOTION C, SIMOTION D (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMOTION D4xx V4.4 for SINAMICS SM150i-2 w. PROFINET (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMOTION P V4.4 and V4.5, SIMOTION P V5, SINAMICS DCM w. PN, SINAMICS DCP w. PN, SINAMICS G110M w. PN, SINAMICS G120(C/P/D) w. PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS G130 V4.7 w. PN, SINAMICS G130 V4.8 w. PN, SINAMICS G150 V4.7 w. PN, SINAMICS G150 V4.8 w. PN, SINAMICS GH150 V4.7 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS GL150 V4.7 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS GM150 V4.7 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS S110 w. PN, SINAMICS S120 V4.7 SP1 w. PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S120 V4.7 w. PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S120 V4.8 w. PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S120 prior to V4.7 w. PN (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S150 V4.7 w. PN, SINAMICS S150 V4.8 w. PN, SINAMICS SL150 V4.7.0 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS SL150 V4.7.4 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS SL150 V4.7.5 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS SM120 V4.7 w. PROFINET, SINAMICS V90 w. PN, SINUMERIK 840D sl, SIRIUS Soft Starter 3RW44 PN. Specially crafted packets sent to port 161/udp could cause a Denial-of-Service condition. The affected devices must be restarted manually. | |||||
CVE-2021-41571 | 1 Apache | 1 Pulsar | 2022-02-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
In Apache Pulsar it is possible to access data from BookKeeper that does not belong to the topics accessible by the authenticated user. The Admin API get-message-by-id requires the user to input a topic and a ledger id. The ledger id is a pointer to the data, and it is supposed to be a valid it for the topic. Authorisation controls are performed against the topic name and there is not proper validation the that ledger id is valid in the context of such ledger. So it may happen that the user is able to read from a ledger that contains data owned by another tenant. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Apache Pulsar version 2.8.0 and prior versions; Apache Pulsar version 2.7.3 and prior versions; Apache Pulsar version 2.6.4 and prior versions. | |||||
CVE-2018-25029 | 1 Silabs | 10 Zgm130s037hgn, Zgm130s037hgn Firmware, Zgm2305a27hgn and 7 more | 2022-02-09 | 4.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
The Z-Wave specification requires that S2 security can be downgraded to S0 or other less secure protocols, allowing an attacker within radio range during pairing to downgrade and then exploit a different vulnerability (CVE-2013-20003) to intercept and spoof traffic. | |||||
CVE-2013-20003 | 1 Silabs | 10 Zgm130s037hgn, Zgm130s037hgn Firmware, Zgm2305a27hgn and 7 more | 2022-02-09 | 7.9 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
Z-Wave devices from Sierra Designs (circa 2013) and Silicon Labs (using S0 security) may use a known, shared network key of all zeros, allowing an attacker within radio range to spoof Z-Wave traffic. | |||||
CVE-2021-46320 | 1 Openzeppelin | 1 Openzeppelin | 2022-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In OpenZeppelin <=v4.4.0, initializer functions that are invoked separate from contract creation (the most prominent example being minimal proxies) may be reentered if they make an untrusted non-view external call. Once an initializer has finished running it can never be re-executed. However, an exception put in place to support multiple inheritance made reentrancy possible, breaking the expectation that there is a single execution. | |||||
CVE-2022-24307 | 1 Joinmastodon | 1 Mastodon | 2022-02-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Mastodon before 3.3.2 and 3.4.x before 3.4.6 has incorrect access control because it does not compact incoming signed JSON-LD activities. (JSON-LD signing has been supported since version 1.6.0.) | |||||
CVE-2008-4250 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008 and 2 more | 2022-02-09 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
The Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, Server 2008, and 7 Pre-Beta allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RPC request that triggers the overflow during path canonicalization, as exploited in the wild by Gimmiv.A in October 2008, aka "Server Service Vulnerability." | |||||
CVE-2021-44866 | 1 Projectworlds | 1 Online Movie Ticket Booking System | 2022-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Online-Movie-Ticket-Booking-System 1.0. The file about.php does not perform input validation on the 'id' paramter. An attacker can append SQL queries to the input to extract sensitive information from the database. | |||||
CVE-2022-0144 | 1 Shelljs Project | 1 Shelljs | 2022-02-09 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
shelljs is vulnerable to Improper Privilege Management | |||||
CVE-2021-45720 | 1 Lru Project | 1 Lru | 2022-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in the lru crate before 0.7.1 for Rust. The iterators have a use-after-free, as demonstrated by an access after a pop operation. | |||||
CVE-2020-12891 | 1 Amd | 2 Radeon Pro Software, Radeon Software | 2022-02-09 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
AMD Radeon Software may be vulnerable to DLL Hijacking through path variable. An unprivileged user may be able to drop its malicious DLL file in any location which is in path environment variable. | |||||
CVE-2022-24348 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Argo-cd | 2022-02-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
Argo CD before 2.1.9 and 2.2.x before 2.2.4 allows directory traversal related to Helm charts because of an error in helmTemplate in repository.go. For example, an attacker may be able to discover credentials stored in a YAML file. |