Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-23565 | 1 Google | 1 Tensorflow | 2022-02-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Tensorflow is an Open Source Machine Learning Framework. An attacker can trigger denial of service via assertion failure by altering a `SavedModel` on disk such that `AttrDef`s of some operation are duplicated. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.8.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.7.1, TensorFlow 2.6.3, and TensorFlow 2.5.3, as these are also affected and still in supported range. | |||||
| CVE-2021-0308 | 2 Debian, Google | 2 Debian Linux, Android | 2022-02-09 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In ReadLogicalParts of basicmbr.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android; Versions: Android-8.1, Android-9, Android-10, Android-11, Android-8.0; Android ID: A-158063095. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29218 | 2 Hpe, Microsoft | 14 Agentless Management, Apollo 20, Apollo 2000 Gen 10 Plus and 11 more | 2022-02-09 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A local unquoted search path security vulnerability has been identified in HPE Agentless Management Service for Windows version(s): Prior to 1.44.0.0, 10.96.0.0. This vulnerability could be exploited locally by a user with high privileges to execute malware that may lead to a loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. HPE has provided software updates to resolve the vulnerability in HPE Agentless Management Service for Windows. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13365 | 1 Zyxel | 8 Nas326, Nas326 Firmware, Nas520 and 5 more | 2022-02-09 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Certain Zyxel products have a locally accessible binary that allows a non-root user to generate a password for an undocumented user account that can be used for a TELNET session as root. This affects NAS520 V5.21(AASZ.4)C0, V5.21(AASZ.0)C0, V5.11(AASZ.3)C0, and V5.11(AASZ.0)C0; NAS542 V5.11(ABAG.0)C0, V5.20(ABAG.1)C0, and V5.21(ABAG.3)C0; NSA325 v2_V4.81(AALS.0)C0 and V4.81(AAAJ.1)C0; NSA310 4.22(AFK.0)C0 and 4.22(AFK.1)C0; NAS326 V5.21(AAZF.8)C0, V5.11(AAZF.4)C0, V5.11(AAZF.2)C0, and V5.11(AAZF.3)C0; NSA310S V4.75(AALH.2)C0; NSA320S V4.75(AANV.2)C0 and V4.75(AANV.1)C0; NSA221 V4.41(AFM.1)C0; and NAS540 V5.21(AATB.5)C0 and V5.21(AATB.3)C0. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13364 | 1 Zyxel | 8 Nas326, Nas326 Firmware, Nas520 and 5 more | 2022-02-09 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A backdoor in certain Zyxel products allows remote TELNET access via a CGI script. This affects NAS520 V5.21(AASZ.4)C0, V5.21(AASZ.0)C0, V5.11(AASZ.3)C0, and V5.11(AASZ.0)C0; NAS542 V5.11(ABAG.0)C0, V5.20(ABAG.1)C0, and V5.21(ABAG.3)C0; NSA325 v2_V4.81(AALS.0)C0 and V4.81(AAAJ.1)C0; NSA310 4.22(AFK.0)C0 and 4.22(AFK.1)C0; NAS326 V5.21(AAZF.8)C0, V5.11(AAZF.4)C0, V5.11(AAZF.2)C0, and V5.11(AAZF.3)C0; NSA310S V4.75(AALH.2)C0; NSA320S V4.75(AANV.2)C0 and V4.75(AANV.1)C0; NSA221 V4.41(AFM.1)C0; and NAS540 V5.21(AATB.5)C0 and V5.21(AATB.3)C0. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29393 | 1 Globalnorthstar | 1 Northstar Club Management | 2022-02-09 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Remote Code Execution in cominput.jsp and comoutput.jsp in Northstar Technologies Inc NorthStar Club Management 6.3 allows remote unauthenticated users to inject and execute arbitrary system commands via the unsanitized user-controlled "command" and "commandvalues" parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44886 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2022-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Zammad 5.0.2, agents can configure "out of office" periods and substitute persons. If the substitute persons didn't have the same permissions as the original agent, they could receive ticket notifications for tickets that they have no access to. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37858 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37857 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37856 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37855 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37854 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37853 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20015 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20014 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20013 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20012 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20011 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20010 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20009 | 2022-02-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2021. Notes: none. | |||||