Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-20125 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2022-06-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In GBoard, there is a possible way to bypass factory reset protections due to a sandbox escape. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-194402515 | |||||
| CVE-2022-20123 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2022-06-23 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| In phNciNfc_RecvMfResp of phNxpExtns_MifareStd.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-221852424 | |||||
| CVE-2022-31059 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse Calendar | 2022-06-23 | 2.1 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Discourse Calendar is a calendar plugin for Discourse, an open-source messaging app. Prior to version 1.0.1, parsing and rendering of Event names can be susceptible to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This vulnerability only affects sites which have modified or disabled Discourse’s default Content Security Policy. This issue is patched in version 1.0.1 of the Discourse Calendar plugin. As a workaround, ensure that the Content Security Policy is enabled, and has not been modified in a way which would make it more vulnerable to XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29301 | 2022-06-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-20660. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2021-20660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-20660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29299 | 2022-06-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-20660. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2021-20660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-20660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26776 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2022-06-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4, macOS Big Sur 11.6.6. An attacker may be able to cause unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26775 | 1 Apple | 2 Mac Os X, Macos | 2022-06-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in Security Update 2022-004 Catalina, macOS Monterey 12.4. An attacker may be able to cause unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26708 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2022-06-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4. An attacker may be able to cause unexpected application termination or arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31847 | 1 Wavlink | 2 Wn579x3, Wn579x3 Firmware | 2022-06-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in /cgi-bin/ExportAllSettings.sh of WAVLINK WN579 X3 M79X3.V5030.180719 allows attackers to obtain sensitive router information via a crafted POST request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31846 | 1 Wavlink | 2 Wn535g3, Wn535g3 Firmware | 2022-06-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in live_mfg.shtml of WAVLINK WN535 G3 M35G3R.V5030.180927 allows attackers to obtain sensitive router information via execution of the exec cmd function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31845 | 1 Wavlink | 2 Wn535g3, Wn535g3 Firmware | 2022-06-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in live_check.shtml of WAVLINK WN535 G3 M35G3R.V5030.180927 allows attackers to obtain sensitive router information via execution of the exec cmd function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31311 | 1 Wavlink | 2 Aerial X 1200m, Aerial X 1200m Firmware | 2022-06-23 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue in adm.cgi of WAVLINK AERIAL X 1200M M79X3.V5030.180719 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted POST request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27859 | 1 Nicdark | 1 Nd-travel | 2022-06-23 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Authenticated (contributor or higher user role) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Nicdark d.o.o. Travel Management plugin <= 2.0 at WordPress. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29406 | 1 Dynamicweblab | 1 Wp-team-manager | 2022-06-23 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Authenticated (contributor or higher user role) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in DynamicWebLab's WordPress Team Manager plugin <= 1.6.9 at WordPress. | |||||
| CVE-2022-33140 | 3 Apache, Apple, Linux | 4 Nifi, Nifi Registry, Macos and 1 more | 2022-06-23 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The optional ShellUserGroupProvider in Apache NiFi 1.10.0 to 1.16.2 and Apache NiFi Registry 0.6.0 to 1.16.2 does not neutralize arguments for group resolution commands, allowing injection of operating system commands on Linux and macOS platforms. The ShellUserGroupProvider is not included in the default configuration. Command injection requires ShellUserGroupProvider to be one of the enabled User Group Providers in the Authorizers configuration. Command injection also requires an authenticated user with elevated privileges. Apache NiFi requires an authenticated user with authorization to modify access policies in order to execute the command. Apache NiFi Registry requires an authenticated user with authorization to read user groups in order to execute the command. The resolution removes command formatting based on user-provided arguments. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4575 | 1 Ibm | 1 Financial Transaction Manager | 2022-06-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager for Digital Payments for Multi-Platform 3.2.0 through 3.2.9 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 166801. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41672 | 1 Peel | 1 Peel Shopping | 2022-06-23 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| PEEL Shopping CMS 9.4.0 is vulnerable to authenticated SQL injection in utilisateurs.php. A user that belongs to the administrator group can inject a malicious SQL query in order to affect the execution logic of the application and retrive information from the database. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1199 | 3 Oracle, Redhat, Vmware | 5 Rapid Planning, Retail Xstore Point Of Service, Fuse and 2 more | 2022-06-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Spring Security (Spring Security 4.1.x before 4.1.5, 4.2.x before 4.2.4, and 5.0.x before 5.0.1; and Spring Framework 4.3.x before 4.3.14 and 5.0.x before 5.0.3) does not consider URL path parameters when processing security constraints. By adding a URL path parameter with special encodings, an attacker may be able to bypass a security constraint. The root cause of this issue is a lack of clarity regarding the handling of path parameters in the Servlet Specification. Some Servlet containers include path parameters in the value returned for getPathInfo() and some do not. Spring Security uses the value returned by getPathInfo() as part of the process of mapping requests to security constraints. In this particular attack, different character encodings used in path parameters allows secured Spring MVC static resource URLs to be bypassed. | |||||
| CVE-2005-1006 | 1 Sonicwall | 2 Soho, Soho Firmware | 2022-06-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in SonicWALL SOHO 5.1.7.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the URL or (2) the user login name, which is not filtered when the administrator views the log file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1275 | 2 Oracle, Vmware | 19 Application Testing Suite, Big Data Discovery, Communications Converged Application Server and 16 more | 2022-06-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework. | |||||