Total
296 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-8384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2020-08-24 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8266, CVE-2018-8380, CVE-2018-8381. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17639 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Openj9 | 2020-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to version 0.21 on Power platforms, calling the System.arraycopy method with a length longer than the length of the source or destination array can, in certain specially crafted code patterns, cause the current method to return prematurely with an undefined return value. This allows whatever value happens to be in the return register at that time to be used as if it matches the method's declared return type. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2299 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-08-05 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The Clipboard::DispatchObject function in app/clipboard/clipboard.cc in Google Chrome before 5.0.375.70 does not properly handle CBF_SMBITMAP objects in a ViewHostMsg_ClipboardWriteObjectsAsync message, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving crafted data from the renderer process, related to a "Type Confusion" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1421 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2020-07-23 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution if a .LNK file is processed.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user, aka 'LNK Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9261 | 1 Huawei | 2 Mate 30, Mate 30 Firmware | 2020-07-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| HUAWEI Mate 30 with versions earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) have a type confusion vulnerability. The system does not properly check and transform the type of certain variable, the attacker tricks the user into installing then running a crafted application, successful exploit could cause code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10913 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-07-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the OCRAndExportToExcel command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9946. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5754 | 1 Webroot | 1 Endpoint Agents | 2020-06-22 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Webroot endpoint agents prior to version v9.0.28.48 allows remote attackers to trigger a type confusion vulnerability over its listening TCP port, resulting in crashing or reading memory contents of the Webroot endpoint agent. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2875 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-05-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 14.0.835.163, does not properly perform object sealing, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors that leverage "type confusion." | |||||
| CVE-2019-15792 | 2 Canonical, Linux | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel | 2020-05-01 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In shiftfs, a non-upstream patch to the Linux kernel included in the Ubuntu 5.0 and 5.3 kernel series, shiftfs_btrfs_ioctl_fd_replace() calls fdget(oldfd), then without further checks passes the resulting file* into shiftfs_real_fdget(), which casts file->private_data, a void* that points to a filesystem-dependent type, to a "struct shiftfs_file_info *". As the private_data is not required to be a pointer, an attacker can use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10912 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the SetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9945. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10911 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the GetFieldValue command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9944. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10910 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the RotatePage command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9943. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10908 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Export command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9865. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10909 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the AddWatermark command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9942. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10891 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Save command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9831. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10889 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2020-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.7.0.29478. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the DuplicatePages command of the communication API. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9828. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10611 | 1 Trianglemicroworks | 1 Scada Data Gateway | 2020-04-22 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Triangle MicroWorks SCADA Data Gateway 3.02.0697 through 4.0.122, 2.41.0213 through 4.0.122 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code due to the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. Only applicable to installations using DNP3 Data Sets. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11603 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with P(9.0) and Q(10.0) (incorporating TEEGRIS) software. Type confusion in the MLDAP Trustlet allows arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2020-16599 (April 2020). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20588 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-30 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SEM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14891 (August 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20589 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-30 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with O(8.x) and P(9.0) (with TEEGRIS) software. There is type confusion in the SKPM Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2019-14892 (August 2019). | |||||