Total
9170 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-1607 | 1 Pdfkit Project | 1 Pdfkit | 2020-02-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ruby PDFKit gem prior to 0.5.3 has a Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2020-0751 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2020-02-13 | 2.1 LOW | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate specific malicious data from a user on a guest operating system.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application.The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving the conditions where Hyper-V would fail to handle these requests., aka 'Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0661. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0661 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2020-02-13 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system, aka 'Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0751. | |||||
| CVE-2018-7159 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2020-02-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The HTTP parser in all current versions of Node.js ignores spaces in the `Content-Length` header, allowing input such as `Content-Length: 1 2` to be interpreted as having a value of `12`. The HTTP specification does not allow for spaces in the `Content-Length` value and the Node.js HTTP parser has been brought into line on this particular difference. The security risk of this flaw to Node.js users is considered to be VERY LOW as it is difficult, and may be impossible, to craft an attack that makes use of this flaw in a way that could not already be achieved by supplying an incorrect value for `Content-Length`. Vulnerabilities may exist in user-code that make incorrect assumptions about the potential accuracy of this value compared to the actual length of the data supplied. Node.js users crafting lower-level HTTP utilities are advised to re-check the length of any input supplied after parsing is complete. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0938 | 1 Ui | 4 Airmax Ac, Airos, Edgemax and 1 more | 2020-02-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Denial of Service attack in airMAX < 8.3.2 , airMAX < 6.0.7 and EdgeMAX < 1.9.7 allow attackers to use the Discovery Protocol in amplification attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4535 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 6 Qemu, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 3 more | 2020-02-12 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The virtqueue_map_sg function in hw/virtio/virtio.c in QEMU before 1.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary files via a crafted savevm image, related to virtio-block or virtio-serial read. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16152 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2020-02-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Denial of service (DoS) vulnerability in FortiClient for Linux 6.2.1 and below may allow an user with low privilege to cause FortiClient processes running under root privilege crashes via sending specially crafted IPC client requests to the fctsched process due the nanomsg not been correctly validated. | |||||
| CVE-2014-7224 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-02-12 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Code Execution vulnerability exists in Android prior to 4.4.0 related to the addJavascriptInterface method and the accessibility and accessibilityTraversal objects, which could let a remote malicious user execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6411 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2020-02-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Omnibox in Google Chrome prior to 80.0.3987.87 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via IDN homographs via a crafted domain name. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13322 | 1 Mi | 1 Mi Browser | 2020-02-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Xiaomi Browser Prior to 10.4.0. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the miui.share application. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in an arbitrary application download. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the user. Was ZDI-CAN-7483. | |||||
| CVE-2014-5468 | 1 Getrailo | 1 Railo | 2020-02-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A File Inclusion vulnerability exists in Railo 4.2.1 and earlier via a specially-crafted URL request to the thumbnail.cfm to specify a malicious PNG file, which could let a remote malicious user obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8122 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2020-02-11 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A missing check in Nextcloud Server 14.0.3 could give recipient the possibility to extend the expiration date of a share they received. | |||||
| CVE-2014-5091 | 1 Status2k | 1 Status2k | 2020-02-10 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability exits in Status2K 2.5 Server Monitoring Software via the multies parameter to includes/functions.php, which could let a malicious user execute arbitrary PHP code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14979 | 1 Woocommerce | 1 Paypal Checkout Payment Gateway | 2020-02-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| ** DISPUTED ** cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_cart in the WooCommerce PayPal Checkout Payment Gateway plugin 1.6.17 for WordPress allows Parameter Tampering in an amount parameter (such as amount_1), as demonstrated by purchasing an item for lower than the intended price. NOTE: The plugin author states it is true that the amount can be manipulated in the PayPal payment flow. However, the amount is validated against the WooCommerce order total before completing the order, and if it doesn’t match then the order will be left in an “On Hold” state. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1784 | 1 Avg | 1 Avg Anti-virus | 2020-02-10 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| The AVG parsing engine 8.5 323, as used in multiple AVG anti-virus products including Anti-Virus Network Edition, Internet Security Netzwerk Edition, Server Edition für Linux/FreeBSD, Anti-Virus SBS Edition, and others allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a crafted (1) RAR and (2) ZIP archive. | |||||
| CVE-2014-8479 | 1 Siemens | 9 Scalance X-300, Scalance X-300 Series Firmware, Scalance X-300eec and 6 more | 2020-02-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The FTP server on Siemens SCALANCE X-300 switches with firmware before 4.0 and SCALANCE X 408 switches with firmware before 4.0 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (reboot) via crafted FTP packets. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2201 | 1 Siemens | 15 Simatic S7-1500 Cpu Firmware, Simatic S7-1511-1 Pn Cpu, Simatic S7-1511c-1 Pn Cpu and 12 more | 2020-02-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU devices before 1.8.3 allow remote attackers to bypass a replay protection mechanism via packets on TCP port 102. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2200 | 1 Siemens | 15 Simatic S7-1500 Cpu Firmware, Simatic S7-1511-1 Pn Cpu, Simatic S7-1511c-1 Pn Cpu and 12 more | 2020-02-10 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU devices before 1.8.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (STOP mode transition) via crafted packets on TCP port 102. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1049 | 1 Siemens | 10 Scalance X-200 Series Firmware, Scalance X201-3p Irt Pro, Scalance X201-3pirt and 7 more | 2020-02-10 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The web server on Siemens SCALANCE X-200IRT switches with firmware before 5.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack sessions via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3111 | 1 Cisco | 54 Ip Conference Phone 7832, Ip Conference Phone 7832 Firmware, Ip Conference Phone 7832 With Multiplatform Firmware and 51 more | 2020-02-07 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol implementation for the Cisco IP Phone could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to remotely execute code with root privileges or cause a reload of an affected IP phone. The vulnerability is due to missing checks when processing Cisco Discovery Protocol messages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to the targeted IP phone. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to remotely execute code with root privileges or cause a reload of an affected IP phone, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Cisco Discovery Protocol is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). | |||||