Total
6 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-22965 | 5 Cisco, Oracle, Siemens and 2 more | 38 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 35 more | 2023-02-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44228 | 11 Apache, Bentley, Cisco and 8 more | 156 Log4j, Synchro, Synchro 4d and 153 more | 2023-02-06 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-45046 | 6 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 61 Log4j, Debian Linux, Fedora and 58 more | 2022-10-05 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers with control over Thread Context Map (MDC) input data when the logging configuration uses a non-default Pattern Layout with either a Context Lookup (for example, $${ctx:loginId}) or a Thread Context Map pattern (%X, %mdc, or %MDC) to craft malicious input data using a JNDI Lookup pattern resulting in an information leak and remote code execution in some environments and local code execution in all environments. Log4j 2.16.0 (Java 8) and 2.12.2 (Java 7) fix this issue by removing support for message lookup patterns and disabling JNDI functionality by default. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44524 | 1 Siemens | 2 Sipass Integrated, Siveillance Identity | 2021-12-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SiPass integrated V2.76 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.80 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.85 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.5 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.6 (All versions < V1.6.284.0). Affected applications insufficiently limit the access to the internal user authentication service. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger several actions on behalf of valid user accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44523 | 1 Siemens | 2 Sipass Integrated, Siveillance Identity | 2021-12-17 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SiPass integrated V2.76 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.80 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.85 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.5 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.6 (All versions < V1.6.284.0). Affected applications insufficiently limit the access to the internal activity feed database. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read, modify or delete activity feed entries. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44522 | 1 Siemens | 2 Sipass Integrated, Siveillance Identity | 2021-12-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SiPass integrated V2.76 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.80 (All versions), SiPass integrated V2.85 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.5 (All versions), Siveillance Identity V1.6 (All versions < V1.6.284.0). Affected applications insufficiently limit the access to the internal message broker system. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to subscribe to arbitrary message queues. | |||||