Total
34 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11539 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2023-01-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, the admin web interface allows an authenticated attacker to inject and execute commands. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11540 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2023-01-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11477 | 5 Canonical, F5, Linux and 2 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2023-01-17 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8218 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2022-12-13 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A code injection vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allows an attacker to crafted a URI to perform an arbitrary code execution via the admin web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8238 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2022-12-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the authenticated user web interface of Pulse Connect Secure and Pulse Policy Secure < 9.1R8.2 could allow attackers to conduct Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). | |||||
| CVE-2022-35258 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 5 Connect Secure, Neurons For Zero-trust Access, Policy Secure and 2 more | 2022-12-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated attacker can cause a denial-of-service to the following products: Ivanti Connect Secure (ICS) in versions prior to 9.1R14.3, 9.1R15.2, 9.1R16.2, and 22.2R4, Ivanti Policy Secure (IPS) in versions prior to 9.1R17 and 22.3R1, and Ivanti Neurons for Zero-Trust Access in versions prior to 22.3R1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35254 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 5 Connect Secure, Neurons For Zero-trust Access, Policy Secure and 2 more | 2022-12-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated attacker can cause a denial-of-service to the following products: Ivanti Connect Secure (ICS) in versions prior to 9.1R14.3, 9.1R15.2, 9.1R16.2, and 22.2R4, Ivanti Policy Secure (IPS) in versions prior to 9.1R17 and 22.3R1, and Ivanti Neurons for Zero-Trust Access in versions prior to 22.3R1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8216 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2021-09-23 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in meeting of Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 allowed an authenticated end-users to find meeting details, if they know the Meeting ID. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11581 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2021-09-16 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to perform OS command injection attacks (against a client) via shell metacharacters to the doCustomRemediateInstructions method, because Runtime.getRuntime().exec() is used. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11582 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2021-09-16 | 3.3 LOW | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, launches a TCP server that accepts local connections on a random port. This can be reached by local HTTP clients, because up to 25 invalid lines are ignored, and because DNS rebinding can occur. (This server accepts, for example, a setcookie command that might be relevant to CVE-2020-11581 exploitation.) | |||||
| CVE-2020-11580 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2021-09-16 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, accepts an arbitrary SSL certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12880 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2021-07-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) and Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) Virtual Appliance before 9.1R8. By manipulating a certain kernel boot parameter, it can be tricked into dropping into a root shell in a pre-install phase where the entire source code of the appliance is available and can be retrieved. (The source code is otherwise inaccessible because the appliance has its hard disks encrypted, and no root shell is available during normal operation.) | |||||
| CVE-2019-11478 | 5 Canonical, F5, Linux and 2 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2021-07-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8261 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure < 9.1R9 is vulnerable to arbitrary cookie injection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8262 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure below 9.1R9 could allow attackers to conduct Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Open Redirection for authenticated user web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-02 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8243 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-10-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure < 9.1R8.2 admin web interface could allow an authenticated attacker to upload custom template to perform an arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5299 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability exists in the web server in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.4R4, leading to memory corruption and possibly remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11509 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.1R15.1, 5.2 before 5.2R12.1, 5.3 before 5.3R15.1, 5.4 before 5.4R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.2, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Incorrect Access Control to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | |||||