Total
4 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-13122 | 1 Noviflow | 1 Noviware | 2020-08-21 | 8.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| The novish command-line interface, included in NoviFlow NoviWare before NW500.2.12 and deployed on NoviSwitch devices, is vulnerable to command injection in the "show status destination ipaddr" command. This could be used by a read-only user (monitoring group) or admin to execute commands on the operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12785 | 1 Noviflow | 1 Noviware | 2017-08-29 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The novish command-line interface, included in the NoviWare software distribution through NW400.2.6 and deployed on NoviSwitch devices, is prone to a buffer overflow in the "show log cli" command. This could be used by a read-only user (monitor role) to gain privileged (root) code execution on the switch via command injection. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12787 | 1 Noviflow | 1 Noviware | 2017-08-29 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A network interface of the novi_process_manager_daemon service, included in the NoviWare software distribution through NW400.2.6 and deployed on NoviSwitch devices, can be inadvertently exposed if an operator attempts to modify ACLs, because of a bug when ACL modifications are applied. This could be leveraged by remote, unauthenticated attackers to gain resultant privileged (root) code execution on the switch, because incoming packet data can contain embedded OS commands, and can also trigger a stack-based buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12786 | 1 Noviflow | 1 Noviware | 2017-08-29 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Network interfaces of the cliengine and noviengine services, included in the NoviWare software distribution through NW400.2.6 and deployed on NoviSwitch devices, can be inadvertently exposed if an operator attempts to modify ACLs, because of a bug when ACL modifications are applied. This could be leveraged by remote, unauthenticated attackers to gain resultant privileged (root) code execution on the switch, because there is a stack-based buffer overflow during unserialization of packet data. | |||||