Total
4 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3660 | 2 Cockpit-project, Redhat | 2 Cockpit, Enterprise Linux | 2023-02-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cockpit (and its plugins) do not seem to protect itself against clickjacking. It is possible to render a page from a cockpit server via another website, inside an <iFrame> HTML entry. This may be used by a malicious website in clickjacking or similar attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3804 | 3 Cockpit-project, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 3 Cockpit, Fedora, Virtualization | 2022-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was found that cockpit before version 184 used glib's base64 decode functionality incorrectly resulting in a denial of service attack. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request with an invalid base64-encoded cookie which could cause the web service to crash. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3698 | 2 Cockpit-project, Redhat | 2 Cockpit, Enterprise Linux | 2022-03-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Cockpit in versions prior to 260 in the way it handles the certificate verification performed by the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). This flaw allows client certificates to authenticate successfully, regardless of the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) configuration or the certificate status. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35850 | 1 Cockpit-project | 1 Cockpit | 2021-01-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| ** DISPUTED ** An SSRF issue was discovered in cockpit-project.org Cockpit 234. NOTE: this is unrelated to the Agentejo Cockpit product. NOTE: the vendor states "I don't think [it] is a big real-life issue." | |||||