Total
47 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-4423 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2023-02-12 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| CloudForms stores user passwords in recoverable format | |||||
| CVE-2015-7502 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 1.9 LOW | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0197 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| CFME: CSRF protection vulnerability via permissive check of the referrer header | |||||
| CVE-2014-0057 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms 3.0 Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The x_button method in the ServiceController (vmdb/app/controllers/service_controller.rb) in Red Hat CloudForms 3.0 Management Engine 5.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary methods via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0186 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Manageiq Enterprise Virtualization Manager | 2023-02-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ManageIQ EVM allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10159 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cfme-gemset, Cloudforms | 2023-02-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| cfme-gemset versions 5.10.4.3 and below, 5.9.9.3 and below are vulnerable to a data leak, due to an improper authorization in the migration log controller. An attacker with access to an unprivileged user can access all VM migration logs available. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2639 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was found that CloudForms does not verify that the server hostname matches the domain name in the certificate when using a custom CA and communicating with Red Hat Virtualization (RHEV) and OpenShift. This would allow an attacker to spoof RHEV or OpenShift systems and potentially harvest sensitive information from CloudForms. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12191 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2023-02-12 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.4 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the CloudForms account configuration when using VMware. By default, a shared account is used that has privileged access to VMRC (VMWare Remote Console) functions that may not be appropriate for users of CloudForms (and thus this account). An attacker could use this vulnerability to view and make changes to settings in the VMRC and virtual machines controlled by it that they should not have access to. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5402 | 1 Redhat | 2 Cloudforms, Cloudforms Management Engine | 2023-02-12 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A code injection flaw was found in the way capacity and utilization imported control files are processed. A remote, authenticated attacker with access to the capacity and utilization feature could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code as the user CFME runs as. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1058 | 3 Canonical, Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Postgresql, Cloudforms | 2023-01-19 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the way Postgresql allowed a user to modify the behavior of a query for other users. An attacker with a user account could use this flaw to execute code with the permissions of superuser in the database. Versions 9.3 through 10 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25716 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2022-10-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Cloudforms. A role-based privileges escalation flaw where export or import of administrator files is possible. An attacker with a specific group can perform actions restricted only to system administrator. This is the affect of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-10783. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. Versions before cfme 5.11.10.1 are affected | |||||
| CVE-2018-7750 | 3 Debian, Paramiko, Redhat | 11 Debian Linux, Paramiko, Ansible Engine and 8 more | 2022-04-18 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| transport.py in the SSH server implementation of Paramiko before 1.17.6, 1.18.x before 1.18.5, 2.0.x before 2.0.8, 2.1.x before 2.1.5, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, 2.3.x before 2.3.2, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests, as demonstrated by channel-open. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11358 | 10 Backdropcms, Debian, Drupal and 7 more | 104 Backdrop, Debian Linux, Drupal and 101 more | 2022-04-06 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10855 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Redhat | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Ansible Engine and 3 more | 2021-08-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Ansible 2.5 prior to 2.5.5, and 2.4 prior to 2.4.5, do not honor the no_log task flag for failed tasks. When the no_log flag has been used to protect sensitive data passed to a task from being logged, and that task does not run successfully, Ansible will expose sensitive data in log files and on the terminal of the user running Ansible. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10778 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2021-07-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| In Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5, the read only widgets can be edited by inspecting the forms and dropping the disabled attribute from the fields since there is no server-side validation. This business logic flaw violate the expected behavior. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14325 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2021-07-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Red Hat CloudForms before 5.11.7.0 was vulnerable to the User Impersonation authorization flaw which allows malicious attacker to create existent and non-existent role-based access control user, with groups and roles. With a selected group of EvmGroup-super_administrator, an attacker can perform any API request as a super administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10779 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2021-07-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 leads to insecure direct object references (IDOR) and functional level access control bypass due to missing privilege check. Therefore, if an attacker knows the right criteria, it is possible to access some sensitive data within the CloudForms. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10783 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2021-07-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.3 HIGH |
| Red Hat CloudForms 4.7 and 5 is affected by a role-based privilege escalation flaw. An attacker with EVM-Operator group can perform actions restricted only to EVM-Super-administrator group, leads to, exporting or importing administrator files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14369 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cloudforms | 2020-12-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| This release fixes a Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability was found in Red Hat CloudForms which forces end users to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which the user is currently authenticated. An attacker can make a forgery HTTP request to the server by crafting custom flash file which can force the user to perform state changing requests like provisioning VMs, running ansible playbooks and so forth. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5418 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 2 more | 6 Debian Linux, Fedora, Leap and 3 more | 2020-10-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is a File Content Disclosure vulnerability in Action View <5.2.2.1, <5.1.6.2, <5.0.7.2, <4.2.11.1 and v3 where specially crafted accept headers can cause contents of arbitrary files on the target system's filesystem to be exposed. | |||||