Total
210374 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-5691 | 2 Imagemagick, Oracle | 2 Imagemagick, Solaris | 2016-12-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
The DCM reader in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-5 and 7.x before 7.0.1-7 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging lack of validation of (1) pixel.red, (2) pixel.green, and (3) pixel.blue. | |||||
CVE-2016-7856 | 1 Adobe | 1 Dng Converter | 2016-12-16 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Adobe DNG Converter versions 9.7 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
CVE-2016-5690 | 2 Imagemagick, Oracle | 2 Imagemagick, Solaris | 2016-12-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
The ReadDCMImage function in DCM reader in ImageMagick before 6.9.4-5 and 7.x before 7.0.1-7 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving the for statement in computing the pixel scaling table. | |||||
CVE-2004-9999 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate has been used as a placeholder by multiple organizations for multiple issues, but it is invalid. Notes: All CVE users should search CVE for the proper identifier. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2009-0242 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used. | |||||
CVE-2010-0200 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2011-2708 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2710. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2710. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2710 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2011-4331 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4110. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4110. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4110 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2013-0743 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA at the suggestion of the CVE project team. The candidate had been associated with a correct report of a security problem, but not a problem that is categorized as a vulnerability within CVE. Compromised or unauthorized SSL certificates are not within CVE's scope. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2013-5903 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-5093, CVE-2013-5942, CVE-2013-5943. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-5093, CVE-2013-5942, and CVE-2013-5943. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-5093, CVE-2013-5942, and/or CVE-2013-5943 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2013-6405 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, CVE-2013-7281. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, and CVE-2013-7281. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-7263, CVE-2013-7264, CVE-2013-7265, and/or CVE-2013-7281 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2014-4159 | 1 Sap | 1 Supplier Relationship Management | 2016-12-15 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
Open redirect vulnerability in in la/umTestSSO.jsp in SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the url parameter. | |||||
CVE-2014-8608 | 1 K7computing | 1 K7av Sentry Device Driver | 2016-12-15 | 4.9 MEDIUM | N/A |
The K7Sentry.sys kernel mode driver (aka K7AV Sentry Device Driver) before 12.8.0.119, as used in multiple K7 Computing products, allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) as demonstrated by a filename containing "crashme$$". | |||||
CVE-2016-3971 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2016-12-15 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lucene_search.jsp in dotCMS before 3.5.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the query parameter to c/portal/layout. | |||||
CVE-2016-4371 | 1 Hp | 6 Service Manager, Service Manager Mobility, Service Manager Server and 3 more | 2016-12-15 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
HPE Service Manager Software 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, 9.33, 9.34, 9.35, 9.40, and 9.41 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information, modify data, and conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors, related to the Server, Web Client, Windows Client, and Service Request components. | |||||
CVE-2016-582384 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6277. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6277 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2016-8708 | 2016-12-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-8823. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-8823. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-8823 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
CVE-2016-1000156 | 1 Mailcwp Project | 1 Mailcwp | 2016-12-15 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Mailcwp remote file upload vulnerability incomplete fix v1.100 | |||||
CVE-2016-5060 | 1 Naver | 1 Ngrinder | 2016-12-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in nGrinder before 3.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) description, (2) email, or (3) username parameter to user/save. | |||||
CVE-2016-9209 | 1 Cisco | 1 Firepower Services For Adaptive Security Appliance | 2016-12-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
A vulnerability in TCP processing in Cisco FirePOWER system software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to download files that would normally be blocked. Affected Products: The following Cisco products are vulnerable: Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) 5500-X Series with FirePOWER Services, Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks - 7000 Series Appliances, Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks - 8000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER 7000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER 8000 Series Appliances, FirePOWER Threat Defense for Integrated Services Routers (ISRs), Next Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPS) for Blue Coat X-Series, Sourcefire 3D System Appliances, Virtual Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System (NGIPSv) for VMware. More Information: CSCvb20102. Known Affected Releases: 2.9.7.10. |