Total
210374 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2013-5528 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2017-01-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Directory traversal vulnerability in the Tomcat administrative web interface in Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via directory traversal sequences in an unspecified input string, aka Bug ID CSCui78815. | |||||
CVE-2015-0763 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) does not properly validate session IDs in http URLs, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive session information via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuu60338. | |||||
CVE-2015-0764 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Meetingplace | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.9) allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted resource request, aka Bug ID CSCus95603. | |||||
CVE-2016-9205 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xr | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability in the HTTP 2.0 request handling code of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Event Management Service daemon (emsd) to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. More Information: CSCvb14425. Known Affected Releases: 6.1.1.BASE. Known Fixed Releases: 6.1.2.6i.MGBL 6.1.22.9i.MGBL 6.2.1.14i.MGBL. | |||||
CVE-2016-9210 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2017-01-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability in the Cisco Unified Reporting upload tool accessed via the Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to modify arbitrary files on the file system. More Information: CSCvb61698. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.11007.2). Known Fixed Releases: 12.0(0.98000.168) 12.0(0.98000.178) 12.0(0.98000.399) 12.0(0.98000.510) 12.0(0.98000.536) 12.0(0.98500.7). | |||||
CVE-2016-6859 | 1 Sap | 1 Hybris | 2017-01-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
Hybris Management Console (HMC) in SAP Hybris before 6.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by triggering an error and then reading a Java stack trace. | |||||
CVE-2016-9204 | 1 Cisco | 2 Nexus 1000v, Nexus 1000v Intercloud Firmware | 2017-01-04 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
A vulnerability in the Cisco Intercloud Fabric (ICF) Director could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to connect to internal services with an internal account. Affected Products: Cisco Nexus 1000V InterCloud is affected. More Information: CSCus99379. Known Affected Releases: 2.2(1). | |||||
CVE-2016-8828 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8829 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8830 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8831 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8832 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8833 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8834 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8835 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8836 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8837 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8838 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8839 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. | |||||
CVE-2016-8840 | 2017-01-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none. |