Total
6504 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-38445 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Dimension, Macos, Windows | 2022-10-18 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Dimension versions 3.4.5 is affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38447 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Dimension, Macos, Windows | 2022-10-18 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Dimension versions 3.4.5 is affected by a Use After Free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38709 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows | 2022-10-14 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1, 21.0.2, and 21.0.3 for Cloud Pak is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 234291. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36774 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 1 more | 2022-10-14 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0, 21.0.1, and 21.0.2 is vulnerable to man in the middle attacks through manipulation of the client proxy configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 233575. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41294 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Robotic Process Automation, Windows | 2022-10-14 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, and 21.0.4 is vulnerable to cross origin resource sharing using the bot api. IBM X-Force ID: 236807. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28887 | 3 Apple, F-secure, Microsoft | 8 Macos, Atlant, Elements Endpoint Detection And Response and 5 more | 2022-10-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure & WithSecure products whereby the aerdl.dll unpacker handler function crashes. This can lead to a possible scanning engine crash. | |||||
| CVE-2019-9855 | 3 Libreoffice, Microsoft, Opensuse | 3 Libreoffice, Windows, Leap | 2022-10-13 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| LibreOffice is typically bundled with LibreLogo, a programmable turtle vector graphics script, which can execute arbitrary python commands contained with the document it is launched from. LibreOffice also has a feature where documents can specify that pre-installed scripts can be executed on various document script events such as mouse-over, etc. Protection was added to block calling LibreLogo from script event handers. However a Windows 8.3 path equivalence handling flaw left LibreOffice vulnerable under Windows that a document could trigger executing LibreLogo via a Windows filename pseudonym. This issue affects: Document Foundation LibreOffice 6.2 versions prior to 6.2.7; 6.3 versions prior to 6.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6775 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the exportValues method within a AcroForm. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8491. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6774 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the deleteItemAt method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8295. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6773 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the richValue property of a Field object within AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8272. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6772 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 2019.010.20098. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8231. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6771 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 2019.010.20098. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the value property of a Field object within AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8230. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6770 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the resetForm method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8229. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6769 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8165. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6768 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8164. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6767 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8163. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6766 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8162. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6765 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the conversion of HTML files to PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8170. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6764 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA Template objects. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-7972. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6763 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2022-10-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.4.1.16828. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the ToggleFormsDesign method of the Foxit.FoxitReader.Ctl ActiveX object. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-7874. | |||||