Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscribe
Total
108 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11478 | 5 Canonical, F5, Linux and 2 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 21 more | 2021-07-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22908 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2021-06-08 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Windows File Resource Profiles in 9.X allows a remote authenticated user with privileges to browse SMB shares to execute arbitrary code as the root user. As of version 9.1R3, this permission is not enabled by default. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22899 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2021-06-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R11.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker to perform remote code execution via Windows Resource Profiles Feature | |||||
| CVE-2021-22887 | 2 Pulsesecure, Supermicro | 24 Psa-5000, Psa-5000 Firmware, Psa-7000 and 21 more | 2021-03-22 | 2.1 LOW | 2.3 LOW |
| A vulnerability in the BIOS of Pulse Secure (PSA-Series Hardware) models PSA5000 and PSA7000 could allow an attacker to compromise BIOS firmware. This vulnerability can be exploited only as part of an attack chain. Before an attacker can compromise the BIOS, they must exploit the device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8254 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2020-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Secure Desktop Client < 9.1R9 has Remote Code Execution (RCE) if users can be convinced to connect to a malicious server. This vulnerability only affects Windows PDC.To improve the security of connections between Pulse clients and Pulse Connect Secure, see below recommendation(s):Disable Dynamic certificate trust for PDC. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8240 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2020-11-03 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Secure Desktop Client < 9.1R9 allows a restricted user on an endpoint machine can use system-level privileges if the Embedded Browser is configured with Credential Provider. This vulnerability only affects Windows PDC if the Embedded Browser is configured with the Credential Provider. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8261 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure < 9.1R9 is vulnerable to arbitrary cookie injection. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8262 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure below 9.1R9 could allow attackers to conduct Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and Open Redirection for authenticated user web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-11-02 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8956 | 2 Microsoft, Pulsesecure | 2 Windows, Pulse Secure Desktop | 2020-10-27 | 1.9 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| Pulse Secure Desktop Client 9.0Rx before 9.0R5 and 9.1Rx before 9.1R4 on Windows reveals users' passwords if Save Settings is enabled. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8243 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-10-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure < 9.1R8.2 admin web interface could allow an authenticated attacker to upload custom template to perform an arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15911 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5299 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability exists in the web server in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.4R4, leading to memory corruption and possibly remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11509 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.1R15.1, 5.2 before 5.2R12.1, 5.3 before 5.3R15.1, 5.4 before 5.4R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.2, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Incorrect Access Control to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11510 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4, an unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted URI to perform an arbitrary file reading vulnerability . | |||||
| CVE-2019-11538 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2020-08-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1, an NFS problem could allow an authenticated attacker to access the contents of arbitrary files on the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11002 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2020-08-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Pulse Secure Desktop Client 5.3 up to and including R6.0 build 1769 on Windows has Insecure Permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8206 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An improper authentication vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1RB that allows an attacker with a users primary credentials to bypass the Google TOTP. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8219 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2020-08-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An insufficient permission check vulnerability exists in Pulse Connect Secure <9.1R8 that allows an attacker to change the password of a full administrator. | |||||