Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-34777 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34775 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34778 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42044 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2021-10-14 | 3.5 LOW | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the Mentor dashboard in the GrowthExperiments extension in MediaWiki through 1.36.2. The Growthexperiments-mentor-dashboard-mentee-overview-add-filter-total-edits-headline, growthexperiments-mentor-dashboard-mentee-overview-add-filter-starred-headline, growthexperiments-mentor-dashboard-mentee-overview-info-text, growthexperiments-mentor-dashboard-mentee-overview-info-legend-headline, and growthexperiments-mentor-dashboard-mentee-overview-active-ago MediaWiki messages were not being properly sanitized and allowed for the injection and execution of HTML and JavaScript. | |||||
| CVE-2020-21648 | 1 Wdja | 1 Wdja Cms | 2021-10-14 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| WDJA CMS v1.5.2 contains an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability in the component admin/cache/manage.php. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34779 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.9 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2020-21649 | 1 Myucms Project | 1 Myucms | 2021-10-14 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Myucms v2.2.1 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the component \controller\index.php, which can be exploited via the sql() method. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34780 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.9 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25467 | 2 Google, Samsung | 4 Android, Exynos 2100, Exynos 980 and 1 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Assuming system privilege is gained, possible buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the Vision DSP kernel driver prior to SMR Oct-2021 Release 1 allows privilege escalation to Root by hijacking loaded library. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34782 | 1 Cisco | 1 Dna Center | 2021-10-14 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the API endpoints for Cisco DNA Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive information that should be restricted. The attacker must have valid device credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper access controls on API endpoints. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending a specific API request to an affected application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive information about other users who are configured with higher privileges on the application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42041 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2021-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in CentralAuth in MediaWiki through 1.36.2. The rightsnone MediaWiki message was not being properly sanitized and allowed for the injection and execution of HTML and JavaScript via the setchange log. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42040 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2021-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in MediaWiki through 1.36.2. A parser function related to loop control allowed for an infinite loop (and php-fpm hang) within the Loops extension because egLoopsCountLimit is mishandled. This could lead to memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34788 | 3 Apple, Cisco, Linux | 3 Macos, Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client, Linux Kernel | 2021-10-14 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the shared library loading mechanism of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Linux and Mac OS could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a shared library hijacking attack on an affected device if the VPN Posture (HostScan) Module is installed on the AnyConnect client. This vulnerability is due to a race condition in the signature verification process for shared library files that are loaded on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of crafted interprocess communication (IPC) messages to the AnyConnect process. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected device with root privileges. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have a valid account on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34772 | 1 Cisco | 1 Orbital | 2021-10-14 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Orbital could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to redirect users to a malicious webpage. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of URL paths in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted URL. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to redirect a user to a malicious website. This vulnerability, known as an open redirect attack, is used in phishing attacks to persuade users to visit malicious sites. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29798 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Aix, Sterling B2b Integrator, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 203734. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29836 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2021-10-14 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.0. through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 204912. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34758 | 1 Cisco | 2 Roomos, Telepresence Collaboration Endpoint | 2021-10-14 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A vulnerability in the memory management of Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software and Cisco RoomOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to corrupt a shared memory segment, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to insufficient access controls to a shared memory resource. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by corrupting a shared memory segment on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload. The device will recover from the corruption upon reboot. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29837 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2021-10-14 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 204913. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29855 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2021-10-14 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.0.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 205684. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29903 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling B2b Integrator | 2021-10-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 5.2.6.0 through 6.1.1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 207506. | |||||