Total
163 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8617 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2022-09-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0024 | 6 Bsdi, Ibm, Isc and 3 more | 12 Bsd Os, Aix, Bind and 9 more | 2022-08-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| DNS cache poisoning via BIND, by predictable query IDs. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0184 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2022-08-17 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| When compiled with the -DALLOW_UPDATES option, bind allows dynamic updates to the DNS server, allowing for malicious modification of DNS records. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8620 | 4 Canonical, Isc, Netapp and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Bind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 1 more | 2022-06-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.15.6 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, An attacker who can establish a TCP connection with the server and send data on that connection can exploit this to trigger the assertion failure, causing the server to exit. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0635 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 17 Bind, Baseboard Management Controller H300e, Baseboard Management Controller H300e Firmware and 14 more | 2022-06-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Versions affected: BIND 9.18.0 When a vulnerable version of named receives a series of specific queries, the named process will eventually terminate due to a failed assertion check. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0667 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 17 Bind, Baseboard Management Controller H300e, Baseboard Management Controller H300e Firmware and 14 more | 2022-06-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When the vulnerability is triggered the BIND process will exit. BIND 9.18.0 | |||||
| CVE-2021-25216 | 4 Debian, Isc, Netapp and 1 more | 23 Debian Linux, Bind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 20 more | 2022-05-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8621 | 5 Canonical, Isc, Netapp and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Bind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 2 more | 2022-04-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.14.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, If a server is configured with both QNAME minimization and 'forward first' then an attacker who can send queries to it may be able to trigger the condition that will cause the server to crash. Servers that 'forward only' are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8623 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2022-04-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must: * be running BIND that was built with "--enable-native-pkcs11" * be signing one or more zones with an RSA key * be able to receive queries from a possible attacker | |||||
| CVE-2021-25214 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 2 more | 24 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 21 more | 2022-04-25 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a malformed IXFR triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion the next time the transferred secondary zone is refreshed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25215 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 3 more | 25 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 22 more | 2022-04-25 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a query for a record triggering the flaw described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects all currently maintained BIND 9 branches (9.11, 9.11-S, 9.16, 9.16-S, 9.17) as well as all other versions of BIND 9. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8625 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 2 more | 9 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 6 more | 2022-04-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credentialconfiguration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. The most likely outcome of a successful exploitation of the vulnerability is a crash of the named process. However, remote code execution, while unproven, is theoretically possible. Affects: BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.27, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.11, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.27-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.11-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition. Also release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch | |||||
| CVE-2018-5740 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 4 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Hp-ux and 8 more | 2022-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| "deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is in use, to experience an assertion failure in name.c. Affects BIND 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8622 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2021-12-02 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated response to that request, triggering an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. Alternately, an off-path attacker would have to correctly guess when a TSIG-signed request was sent, along with other characteristics of the packet and message, and spoof a truncated response to trigger an assertion failure, causing the server to exit. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25218 | 2 Fedoraproject, Isc | 2 Fedora, Bind | 2021-09-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.16.19, 9.17.16. Also, version 9.16.19-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition When a vulnerable version of named receives a query under the circumstances described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects only BIND 9 releases 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and release 9.16.19-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6471 | 2 F5, Isc | 17 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 14 more | 2021-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A race condition which may occur when discarding malformed packets can result in BIND exiting due to a REQUIRE assertion failure in dispatch.c. Versions affected: BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.7, 9.12.0 -> 9.12.4-P1, 9.14.0 -> 9.14.2. Also all releases of the BIND 9.13 development branch and version 9.15.0 of the BIND 9.15 development branch and BIND Supported Preview Edition versions 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.7-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0888 | 2 Debian, Isc | 2 Debian Linux, Bind | 2020-12-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| named in BIND 8.2 through 8.2.2-P6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending an SRV record to the server, aka the "srv bug." | |||||
| CVE-2018-5741 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2020-10-20 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| To provide fine-grained controls over the ability to use Dynamic DNS (DDNS) to update records in a zone, BIND 9 provides a feature called update-policy. Various rules can be configured to limit the types of updates that can be performed by a client, depending on the key used when sending the update request. Unfortunately, some rule types were not initially documented, and when documentation for them was added to the Administrator Reference Manual (ARM) in change #3112, the language that was added to the ARM at that time incorrectly described the behavior of two rule types, krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain. This incorrect documentation could mislead operators into believing that policies they had configured were more restrictive than they actually were. This affects BIND versions prior to BIND 9.11.5 and BIND 9.12.3. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8616 | 2 Debian, Isc | 2 Debian Linux, Bind | 2020-10-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to process the referral. This has at least two potential effects: The performance of the recursing server can potentially be degraded by the additional work required to perform these fetches, and The attacker can exploit this behavior to use the recursing server as a reflector in a reflection attack with a high amplification factor. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6477 | 2 Fedoraproject, Isc | 2 Fedora, Bind | 2020-10-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| With pipelining enabled each incoming query on a TCP connection requires a similar resource allocation to a query received via UDP or via TCP without pipelining enabled. A client using a TCP-pipelined connection to a server could consume more resources than the server has been provisioned to handle. When a TCP connection with a large number of pipelined queries is closed, the load on the server releasing these multiple resources can cause it to become unresponsive, even for queries that can be answered authoritatively or from cache. (This is most likely to be perceived as an intermittent server problem). | |||||