Total
549 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-17142 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2019-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.6.0.25114. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of script within a Keystroke action of a listbox field. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9081. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17143 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2019-10-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.6.0.25114. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DWG files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9273. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17144 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2019-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.6.0.25114. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the conversion of DWG files to PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9274. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17145 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2019-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.6.0.25114. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the conversion of DXF files to PDF. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-9276. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6776 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method when processing watermarks within AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8801. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13317 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate actions. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8759. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13316 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate actions. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8757. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13315 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote atackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the removeField method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8656. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13318 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of the util.printf Javascript method. The application processes the %p parameter in the format string, allowing heap addresses to be returned to the script. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8544. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13319 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8669. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13320 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5.0.20723. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of AcroForms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8814. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9952 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Button elements. When setting the formattedValue attribute, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5527. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9954 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Button elements. When setting the y attribute, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5529. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9955 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the XFA resolveNode method of Button elements. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5531. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9956 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Button elements. When setting the title attribute, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5617. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9957 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Button elements. When parsing arguments passed to the resetData method, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5618. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9945 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getField method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5382. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9946 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the setTimeOut method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5471. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9947 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of BMP images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length, heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5472. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9948 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of typed arrays. The issue results from the lack of proper initialization of a pointer prior to accessing it. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5380. | |||||