Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-35975 | 1 Weave | 1 Gitops Tools | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The GitOps Tools Extension for VSCode can make it easier to manage Flux objects. A specially crafted Flux object may allow for remote code execution in the machine running the extension, in the context of the user that is running VSCode. Users using the VSCode extension to manage clusters that are shared amongst other users are affected by this issue. The only safe mitigation is to update to the latest version of the extension. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35213 | 1 Ecommerce-codeigniter-bootstrap Project | 1 Ecommerce-codeigniter-bootstrap | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Ecommerce-CodeIgniter-Bootstrap before commit 56465f was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the function base_url() at /blog/blogpublish.php. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27500 | 1 Intel | 1 Support | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect default permissions for the Intel(R) Support Android application before 21.07.40 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27795 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A segmentation fault was discovered in radare2 with adf command. In libr/core/cmd_anal.c, when command "adf" has no or wrong argument, anal_fcn_data (core, input + 1) --> RAnalFunction *fcn = r_anal_get_fcn_in (core->anal, core->offset, -1); returns null pointer for fcn causing segmentation fault later in ensure_fcn_range (fcn). | |||||
| CVE-2022-36171 | 1 Mapgis | 1 Mapgis Igserver | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| MapGIS IGServer 10.5.6.11 is vulnerable to Arbitrary file deletion. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36224 | 1 Xunruicms | 1 Xunruicms | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| XunRuiCMS V4.5.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2022-26017 | 1 Intel | 1 Driver \& Support Assistant | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| Improper access control in the Intel(R) DSA software for before version 22.2.14 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3484 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3408 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36276 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36275 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36274 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36273 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36272 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36271 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36270 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36269 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36268 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36267 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36266 | 2022-08-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | |||||