Filtered by vendor Foxitsoftware
Subscribe
Total
791 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-18688 | 11 Apple, Code-industry, Foxitsoftware and 8 more | 16 Macos, Master Pdf Editor, Foxit Reader and 13 more | 2021-01-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, an Incremental Saving vulnerability exists in multiple products. When an attacker uses the Incremental Saving feature to add pages or annotations, Body Updates are displayed to the user without any action by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects LibreOffice, Master PDF Editor, Nitro Pro, Nitro Reader, Nuance Power PDF Standard, PDF Editor 6 Pro, PDFelement6 Pro, PDF Studio Viewer 2018, PDF Studio Pro, Perfect PDF 10 Premium, and Perfect PDF Reader. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19418 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Pdf Activex, Windows | 2021-01-13 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF ActiveX before 5.5.1 allows remote code execution via command injection because of the lack of a security permission control. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20309 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyGetAppEdition race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20310 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20311 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCPDFAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20312 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20313 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyPreviewAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20314 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCheckLicence race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20315 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20316 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2021-01-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28203 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-12-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527 and earlier. There is a null pointer access/dereference while opening a crafted PDF file, leading the application to crash (denial of service). | |||||
| CVE-2018-9958 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2020-11-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Text Annotations. When setting the point attribute, the process does not properly validate the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5620. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14425 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Foxit Reader | 2020-11-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit Reader before 10.0 allows Remote Command Execution via the app.opencPDFWebPage JavsScript API. An attacker can execute local files and bypass the security dialog. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17417 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11657. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17416 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11497. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6752 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on vulnerable installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 9.3.10826. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF documents. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-7620. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17412 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 3d, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11224. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17411 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 3d, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11190. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17410 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of GIF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11135. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17413 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 3d, Windows | 2020-10-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11226. | |||||