Total
210374 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-20260 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20258 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20257 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20256 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20243 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20241 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20239 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20237 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20236 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20235 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20234 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20230 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20227 | 2022-09-29 | N/A | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during the year 2019. Notes: none. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4818 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Information Server | 2022-09-29 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.1, 8.5, and 8,7 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by improper restrictions on directories. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability via the DataStage application to load or import content functionality to view arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2201 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Mq | 2022-09-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM WebSphere MQ 7.1 is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by an error when handling user ids. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the security configuration setup on a SVRCONN channel and flood the queue manager. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2160 | 1 Ibm | 1 Rational Change | 2022-09-29 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Change 5.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the SUPP_TEMPLATE_FLAG parameter in a specially-crafted URL to execute script in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the URL is clicked. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4820 | 1 Ibm | 1 Rational Asset Manager | 2022-09-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational Asset Manager 7.5 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using the UID parameter to modify another user's preferences. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23852 | 5 Debian, Libexpat Project, Netapp and 2 more | 6 Debian Linux, Libexpat, Clustered Data Ontap and 3 more | 2022-09-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.4 has a signed integer overflow in XML_GetBuffer, for configurations with a nonzero XML_CONTEXT_BYTES. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21703 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap and 2 more | 2022-09-29 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| In PHP versions 7.3.x up to and including 7.3.31, 7.4.x below 7.4.25 and 8.0.x below 8.0.12, when running PHP FPM SAPI with main FPM daemon process running as root and child worker processes running as lower-privileged users, it is possible for the child processes to access memory shared with the main process and write to it, modifying it in a way that would cause the root process to conduct invalid memory reads and writes, which can be used to escalate privileges from local unprivileged user to the root user. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41099 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Management Services For Element Software And Netapp Hci and 2 more | 2022-09-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. An integer overflow bug in the underlying string library can be used to corrupt the heap and potentially result with denial of service or remote code execution. The vulnerability involves changing the default proto-max-bulk-len configuration parameter to a very large value and constructing specially crafted network payloads or commands. The problem is fixed in Redis versions 6.2.6, 6.0.16 and 5.0.14. An additional workaround to mitigate the problem without patching the redis-server executable is to prevent users from modifying the proto-max-bulk-len configuration parameter. This can be done using ACL to restrict unprivileged users from using the CONFIG SET command. | |||||