Total
63 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-27580 | 2023-03-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CodeIgniter Shield provides authentication and authorization for the CodeIgniter 4 PHP framework. An improper implementation was found in the password storage process. All hashed passwords stored in Shield v1.0.0-beta.3 or earlier are easier to crack than expected due to the vulnerability. Therefore, they should be removed as soon as possible. If an attacker gets (1) the user's hashed password by Shield, and (2) the hashed password (SHA-384 hash without salt) from somewhere, the attacker may easily crack the user's password. Upgrade to Shield v1.0.0-beta.4 or later to fix this issue. After upgrading, all users’ hashed passwords should be updated (saved to the database). There are no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0567 | 1 Php | 1 Php | 2023-03-10 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In PHP 8.0.X before 8.0.28, 8.1.X before 8.1.16 and 8.2.X before 8.2.3, password_verify() function may accept some invalid Blowfish hashes as valid. If such invalid hash ever ends up in the password database, it may lead to an application allowing any password for this entry as valid. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26115 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2023-02-24 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A use of password hash with insufficient computational effort vulnerability [CWE-916] in FortiSandbox before 4.2.0 may allow an attacker with access to the password database to efficiently mount bulk guessing attacks to recover the passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40258 | 1 Ami | 2 Megarac Spx-12, Megarac Spx-13 | 2023-02-07 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| AMI Megarac Weak password hashes for Redfish & API | |||||
| CVE-2022-47732 | 1 Yeastar | 4 N412, N412 Firmware, N824 and 1 more | 2023-02-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Yeastar N412 and N824 Configuration Panel 42.x and 45.x, an unauthenticated attacker can create backup file and download it, revealing admin hash, allowing, once cracked, to login inside the Configuration Panel, otherwise, replacing the hash in the archive and restoring it on the device which will change admin password granting access to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12069 | 1 Pilz | 1 Pmc | 2023-01-05 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Pilz PMC programming tool 3.x before 3.5.17 (based on CODESYS Development System), the password-hashing feature requires insufficient computational effort. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14389 | 1 Redhat | 1 Keycloak | 2022-11-16 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| It was found that Keycloak before version 12.0.0 would permit a user with only view-profile role to manage the resources in the new account console, allowing access and modification of data the user was not intended to have. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21253 | 1 Onlinevotingsystem Project | 1 Onlinevotingsystem | 2022-10-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OnlineVotingSystem is an open source project hosted on GitHub. OnlineVotingSystem before version 1.1.2 hashes user passwords without a salt, which is vulnerable to dictionary attacks. Therefore there is a threat of security breach in the voting system. Without a salt, it is much easier for attackers to pre-compute the hash value using dictionary attack techniques such as rainbow tables to crack passwords. This problem is fixed and published in version 1.1.2. A long randomly generated salt is added to the password hash function to better protect passwords stored in the voting system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24041 | 1 Siemens | 8 Desigo Dxr2, Desigo Dxr2 Firmware, Desigo Pxc3 and 5 more | 2022-10-05 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Desigo DXR2 (All versions < V01.21.142.5-22), Desigo PXC3 (All versions < V01.21.142.4-18), Desigo PXC4 (All versions < V02.20.142.10-10884), Desigo PXC5 (All versions < V02.20.142.10-10884). The web application stores the PBKDF2 derived key of users passwords with a low iteration count. An attacker with user profile access privilege can retrieve the stored password hashes of other accounts and then successfully perform an offline cracking attack and recover the plaintext passwords of other users. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36071 | 1 Sftpgo Project | 1 Sftpgo | 2022-09-08 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| SFTPGo is configurable SFTP server with optional HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV support. SFTPGo WebAdmin and WebClient support login using TOTP (Time-based One Time Passwords) as a secondary authentication factor. Because TOTPs are often configured on mobile devices that can be lost, stolen or damaged, SFTPGo also supports recovery codes. These are a set of one time use codes that can be used instead of the TOTP. In SFTPGo versions from version 2.2.0 to 2.3.3 recovery codes can be generated before enabling two-factor authentication. An attacker who knows the user's password could potentially generate some recovery codes and then bypass two-factor authentication after it is enabled on the account at a later time. This issue has been fixed in version 2.3.4. Recovery codes can now only be generated after enabling two-factor authentication and are deleted after disabling it. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31177 | 1 Flask-appbuilder Project | 1 Flask-appbuilder | 2022-08-08 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| Flask-AppBuilder is an application development framework built on top of Flask python framework. In versions prior to 4.1.3 an authenticated Admin user could query other users by their salted and hashed passwords strings. These filters could be made by using partial hashed password strings. The response would not include the hashed passwords, but an attacker could infer partial password hashes and their respective users. This issue has been fixed in version 4.1.3. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37551 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2021.2.16363, system user passwords were hashed with SHA-256. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38979 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Security Guardium Key Lifecycle Manager, Security Key Lifecycle Manager and 2 more | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 3.0, 3.0.1, 4.0, and 4.1 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 212785. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32997 | 1 Bakerhughes | 10 Bentley Nevada 3500\/22m \(288055-01\), Bentley Nevada 3500\/22m \(288055-01\) Firmware, Bentley Nevada 3500 Rack Configuration \(129133-01\) and 7 more | 2022-06-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The affected Baker Hughes Bentley Nevada products (3500 System 1 6.x, Part No. 3060/00 versions 6.98 and prior, 3500 System 1, Part No. 3071/xx & 3072/xx versions 21.1 HF1 and prior, 3500 Rack Configuration, Part No. 129133-01 versions 6.4 and prior, and 3500/22M Firmware, Part No. 288055-01 versions 5.05 and prior) utilize a weak encryption algorithm for storage and transmission of sensitive data, which may allow an attacker to more easily obtain credentials used for access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29731 | 1 Ict | 4 Protege Gx, Protege Gx Firmware, Protege Wx and 1 more | 2022-06-13 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An access control issue in ICT Protege GX/WX 2.08 allows attackers to leak SHA1 password hashes of other users. | |||||
| CVE-2020-16231 | 1 Bachmann | 40 Cpc210, Cpc210 Firmware, Cs200 and 37 more | 2022-06-08 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The affected Bachmann Electronic M-Base Controllers of version MSYS v1.06.14 and later use weak cryptography to protect device passwords. Affected controllers that are actively supported include MX207, MX213, MX220, MC206, MC212, MC220, and MH230 hardware controllers, and affected end-of-life controller include MC205, MC210, MH212, ME203, CS200, MP213, MP226, MPC240, MPC265, MPC270, MPC293, MPE270, and CPC210 hardware controllers. Security Level 0 is set at default from the manufacturer, which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain access to the password hashes. Security Level 4 is susceptible if an authenticated remote attacker or an unauthenticated person with physical access to the device reads and decrypts the password to conduct further attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25157 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 32 Fx5uc, Fx5uc-32mr\/ds-ts, Fx5uc-32mr\/ds-ts Firmware and 29 more | 2022-06-02 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Use of Password Hash Instead of Password for Authentication vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U(C) CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R00/01/02CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R04/08/16/32/120(EN)CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R16/32/64MTCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71C24(-R2/R4) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71EN71 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71GF11-T2 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71GP21(S)-SX all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ72GF15-T2 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q03UDECPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ71C24N(-R2/R4) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ71E71-100 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series L02/06/26CPU(-P) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series L26CPU-(P)BT all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ71C24(-R2) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ71E71-100 all versions and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ72GF15-T2 all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to disclose or tamper with the information in the product by using an eavesdropped password hash. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25156 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 32 Fx5uc, Fx5uc-32mr\/ds-ts, Fx5uc-32mr\/ds-ts Firmware and 29 more | 2022-06-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Use of Weak Hash vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U(C) CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R00/01/02CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R04/08/16/32/120(EN)CPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120PCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71C24(-R2/R4) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ71EN71 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R series RJ72GF15-T2 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q03UDECPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q04/06/10/13/20/26/50/100UDEHCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q03/04/06/13/26UDVCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series Q04/06/13/26UDPVCPU all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ71C24N(-R2/R4) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ71E71-100 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ72BR15 all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC Q series QJ72LP25(-25/G/GE) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series L02/06/26CPU(-P) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series L26CPU-(P)BT all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ71C24(-R2) all versions, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ71E71-100 all versions and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC L series LJ72GF15-T2 all versions allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to login to the product by using a password reversed from a previously eavesdropped password hash. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36767 | 1 Digi | 45 6350-sr, 6350-sr Firmware, Cm and 42 more | 2022-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Digi RealPort through 4.10.490, authentication relies on a challenge-response mechanism that gives access to the server password, making the protection ineffective. An attacker may send an unauthenticated request to the server. The server will reply with a weakly-hashed version of the server's access password. The attacker may then crack this hash offline in order to successfully login to the server. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23348 | 1 Bigantsoft | 1 Bigant Server | 2022-04-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| BigAnt Software BigAnt Server v5.6.06 was discovered to utilize weak password hashes. | |||||