Total
934 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-17057 | 2 Limesurvey, Tecnick | 2 Limesurvey, Tcpdf | 2019-04-26 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in TCPDF before 6.2.22. Attackers can trigger deserialization of arbitrary data via the phar:// wrapper. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7361 | 1 Autodesk | 11 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Architecture and 8 more | 2019-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An attacker may convince a victim to open a malicious action micro (.actm) file that has serialized data, which may trigger a code execution in Autodesk Advance Steel 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD Architecture 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD Electrical 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD Map 3D 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD Mechanical 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD MEP 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD P&ID 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD Plant 3D 2018, Autodesk AutoCAD LT 2018, and Autodesk Civil 3D 2018. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18365 | 1 Github | 1 Github | 2019-03-29 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The Management Console in GitHub Enterprise 2.8.x before 2.8.7 has a deserialization issue that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. This occurs because the enterprise session secret is always the same, and can be found in the product's source code. By sending a crafted cookie signed with this secret, one can call Marshal.load with arbitrary data, which is a problem because the Marshal data format allows Ruby objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20221 | 1 Deltek | 1 Ajera | 2019-03-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Secure/SAService.rem in Deltek Ajera Timesheets 9.10.16 and prior are vulnerable to remote code execution via deserialization of untrusted user input from an authenticated user. The executed code will run as the IIS Application Pool that is running the application. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0824 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2019-03-12 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in "Microsoft COM for Windows" when it fails to properly handle serialized objects, aka "Microsoft COM for Windows Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12557 | 1 Hp | 1 Intelligent Management Center | 2019-03-08 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Remote Code Execution vulnerability in HPE intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT version IMC Plat 7.3 E0504P2 and earlier was found. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1295 | 1 Apache | 1 Ignite | 2019-03-05 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Apache Ignite 2.3 or earlier, the serialization mechanism does not have a list of classes allowed for serialization/deserialization, which makes it possible to run arbitrary code when 3-rd party vulnerable classes are present in Ignite classpath. The vulnerability can be exploited if the one sends a specially prepared form of a serialized object to one of the deserialization endpoints of some Ignite components - discovery SPI, Ignite persistence, Memcached endpoint, socket steamer. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20148 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2019-03-04 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In WordPress before 4.9.9 and 5.x before 5.0.1, contributors could conduct PHP object injection attacks via crafted metadata in a wp.getMediaItem XMLRPC call. This is caused by mishandling of serialized data at phar:// URLs in the wp_get_attachment_thumb_file function in wp-includes/post.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8736 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2019-03-01 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Apache OpenMeetings before 3.1.2 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via RMI deserialization attack. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8018 | 1 Apache | 1 Ignite | 2019-02-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Apache Ignite before 2.4.8 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3, the serialization mechanism does not have a list of classes allowed for serialization/deserialization, which makes it possible to run arbitrary code when 3-rd party vulnerable classes are present in Ignite classpath. The vulnerability can be exploited if the one sends a specially prepared form of a serialized object to GridClientJdkMarshaller deserialization endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9843 | 1 Cyberark | 1 Password Vault | 2019-02-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The REST API in CyberArk Password Vault Web Access before 9.9.5 and 10.x before 10.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a serialized .NET object in an Authorization HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6503 | 1 Chatopera | 1 Cosin | 2019-02-15 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| There is a deserialization vulnerability in Chatopera cosin v3.10.0. An attacker can execute commands during server-side deserialization by uploading maliciously constructed files. This is related to the TemplateController.java impsave method and the MainUtils toObject method. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1000005 | 1 Mpdf Project | 1 Mpdf | 2019-02-14 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| mPDF version 7.1.7 and earlier contains a CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in getImage() method of Image/ImageProcessor class that can result in Arbitry code execution, file write, etc.. This attack appears to be exploitable via attacker must host crafted image on victim server and trigger generation of pdf file with content <img src="phar://path/to/crafted/image">. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 7.1.8. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20732 | 6 Hpe, Ibm, Linux and 3 more | 6 Hp-ux Ipfilter, Aix, Linux Kernel and 3 more | 2019-02-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SAS Web Infrastructure Platform before 9.4M6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Java deserialization variant. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000833 | 1 Zoneminder | 1 Zoneminder | 2019-02-06 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ZoneMinder version <= 1.32.2 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in User-controlled parameter that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000827 | 1 Ubilling | 1 Ubilling | 2019-02-01 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ubilling version <= 0.9.2 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in user-controlled parameter that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000824 | 1 Megamek | 1 Megamek | 2019-02-01 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| MegaMek version < v0.45.1 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in Object Stream Connection that can result in Disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, SSRF, remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8021 | 1 Apache | 1 Superset | 2019-01-30 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Versions of Superset prior to 0.23 used an unsafe load method from the pickle library to deserialize data leading to possible remote code execution. Note Superset 0.23 was released prior to any Superset release under the Apache Software Foundation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18628 | 1 Pippo | 1 Pippo | 2019-01-28 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Pippo 1.11.0. The function SerializationSessionDataTranscoder.decode() calls ObjectInputStream.readObject() to deserialize a SessionData object without checking the object types. An attacker can create a malicious object, base64 encode it, and place it in the PIPPO_SESSION field of a cookie. Sending this cookie may lead to remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18013 | 1 Citrix | 1 Xenmobile Server | 2019-01-28 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| ** DISPUTED *** Xen Mobile through 10.8.0 includes a service listening on port 5001 within its firewall that accepts unauthenticated input. If this service is supplied with raw serialised Java objects, it deserialises them back into Java objects in memory, giving rise to a remote code execution vulnerability. NOTE: the vendor disputes that this is a vulnerability, stating it is "already mitigated by the internal firewall that limits access to configuration services to localhost." | |||||