Total
1255 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-36114 | 1 Rust-lang | 1 Cargo | 2023-01-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
Cargo is a package manager for the rust programming language. It was discovered that Cargo did not limit the amount of data extracted from compressed archives. An attacker could upload to an alternate registry a specially crafted package that extracts way more data than its size (also known as a "zip bomb"), exhausting the disk space on the machine using Cargo to download the package. Note that by design Cargo allows code execution at build time, due to build scripts and procedural macros. The vulnerabilities in this advisory allow performing a subset of the possible damage in a harder to track down way. Your dependencies must still be trusted if you want to be protected from attacks, as it's possible to perform the same attacks with build scripts and procedural macros. The vulnerability is present in all versions of Cargo. Rust 1.64, to be released on September 22nd, will include a fix for it. Since the vulnerability is just a more limited way to accomplish what a malicious build scripts or procedural macros can do, we decided not to publish Rust point releases backporting the security fix. Patch files are available for Rust 1.63.0 are available in the wg-security-response repository for people building their own toolchain. We recommend users of alternate registries to excercise care in which package they download, by only including trusted dependencies in their projects. Please note that even with these vulnerabilities fixed, by design Cargo allows arbitrary code execution at build time thanks to build scripts and procedural macros: a malicious dependency will be able to cause damage regardless of these vulnerabilities. crates.io implemented server-side checks to reject these kinds of packages years ago, and there are no packages on crates.io exploiting these vulnerabilities. crates.io users still need to excercise care in choosing their dependencies though, as the same concerns about build scripts and procedural macros apply here. | |||||
CVE-2018-18898 | 4 Bestpractical, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 4 Request Tracker, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 1 more | 2023-01-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
The email-ingestion feature in Best Practical Request Tracker 4.1.13 through 4.4 allows denial of service by remote attackers via an algorithmic complexity attack on email address parsing. | |||||
CVE-2022-39209 | 2 Fedoraproject, Github | 2 Fedora, Cmark-gfm | 2023-01-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
cmark-gfm is GitHub's fork of cmark, a CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program in C. In versions prior to 0.29.0.gfm.6 a polynomial time complexity issue in cmark-gfm's autolink extension may lead to unbounded resource exhaustion and subsequent denial of service. Users may verify the patch by running `python3 -c 'print("![l"* 100000 + "\n")' | ./cmark-gfm -e autolink`, which will resource exhaust on unpatched cmark-gfm but render correctly on patched cmark-gfm. This vulnerability has been patched in 0.29.0.gfm.6. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should disable the use of the autolink extension. | |||||
CVE-2021-46784 | 2 Debian, Squid-cache | 2 Debian Linux, Squid | 2023-01-19 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
In Squid 3.x through 3.5.28, 4.x through 4.17, and 5.x before 5.6, due to improper buffer management, a Denial of Service can occur when processing long Gopher server responses. | |||||
CVE-2022-21952 | 1 Suse | 1 Manager Server | 2023-01-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in spacewalk-java of SUSE Manager Server 4.1, SUSE Manager Server 4.2 allows remote attackers to easily exhaust available disk resources leading to DoS. This issue affects: SUSE Manager Server 4.1 spacewalk-java versions prior to 4.1.46. SUSE Manager Server 4.2 spacewalk-java versions prior to 4.2.37. | |||||
CVE-2021-26355 | 1 Amd | 48 Epyc 7003, Epyc 7003 Firmware, Epyc 72f3 and 45 more | 2023-01-18 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
Insufficient fencing and checks in System Management Unit (SMU) may result in access to invalid message port registers that could result in a potential denial-of-service. | |||||
CVE-2022-34335 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Sterling Partner Engagement Manager, Linux Kernel | 2023-01-18 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.2, 6.2.0, and 6.2.1 could allow an authenticated user to exhaust server resources which could lead to a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 229705. | |||||
CVE-2016-8666 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2023-01-17 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
The IP stack in the Linux kernel before 4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption and panic) or possibly have unspecified other impact by triggering use of the GRO path for packets with tunnel stacking, as demonstrated by interleaved IPv4 headers and GRE headers, a related issue to CVE-2016-7039. | |||||
CVE-2023-21557 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 20h2 and 12 more | 2023-01-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2023-21547 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 6 more | 2023-01-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2022-45061 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Python | 2023-01-13 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Python before 3.11.1. An unnecessary quadratic algorithm exists in one path when processing some inputs to the IDNA (RFC 3490) decoder, such that a crafted, unreasonably long name being presented to the decoder could lead to a CPU denial of service. Hostnames are often supplied by remote servers that could be controlled by a malicious actor; in such a scenario, they could trigger excessive CPU consumption on the client attempting to make use of an attacker-supplied supposed hostname. For example, the attack payload could be placed in the Location header of an HTTP response with status code 302. A fix is planned in 3.11.1, 3.10.9, 3.9.16, 3.8.16, and 3.7.16. | |||||
CVE-2018-17581 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Exiv2 and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Exiv2 and 3 more | 2023-01-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
CiffDirectory::readDirectory() at crwimage_int.cpp in Exiv2 0.26 has excessive stack consumption due to a recursive function, leading to Denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2022-45199 | 1 Python | 1 Pillow | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Pillow before 9.3.0 allows denial of service via SAMPLESPERPIXEL. | |||||
CVE-2019-10923 | 1 Siemens | 78 Cp1604, Cp1604 Firmware, Cp1616 and 75 more | 2023-01-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: DK Standard Ethernet Controller, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200P, SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DO DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 4AO U/I 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DIO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DO, DC24V/2A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI; 4 U/I; 4 RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/0,5A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN: IO-Link Master, SIMATIC ET200M (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200pro, SIMATIC ET200S (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC NET CP 1604, SIMATIC NET CP 1616, SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (incl. SIPLUS NET variants), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010, SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010, SIMOTION (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS DCM, SINAMICS DCP, SINAMICS G110M V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS G120 V4.7 Control Unit (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS G130 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS G150 Control Unit, SINAMICS GH150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS GL150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS GM150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS S110 Control Unit, SINAMICS S120 V4.7 Control Unit and CBE20 (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S150 Control Unit, SINAMICS SL150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS SM120 V4.7 Control Unit, SINUMERIK 828D, SINUMERIK 840D sl, SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU, SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP. An attacker with network access to an affected product may cause a denial of service condition by breaking the real-time synchronization (IRT) of the affected installation. | |||||
CVE-2019-10936 | 1 Siemens | 130 Dk Standard Ethernet Controller, Dk Standard Ethernet Controller Firmware, Ek-ertec 200 and 127 more | 2023-01-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: DK Standard Ethernet Controller, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200P, SIMATIC CFU PA, SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU, SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200AL, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 16DO DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 4AO U/I 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DIO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8 DO, DC24V/2A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8AI; 4 U/I; 4 RTD/TC 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DI, DC24V, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/0,5A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 4xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, 8DO, DC24V/1,3A, 8xM12, SIMATIC ET200ecoPN: IO-Link Master, SIMATIC ET200M (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN BA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200MP IM155-5 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200pro, SIMATIC ET200S (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN BA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN HS (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN ST (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN/2 HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200SP IM155-6 PN/3 HF (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC HMI Comfort Outdoor Panels 7" & 15" (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC HMI Comfort Panels 4" - 22" (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC HMI KTP Mobile Panels, SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler, SIMATIC PROFINET Driver, SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP, SIMATIC S7-400 H V6 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-410 V8 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC TDC CP51M1, SIMATIC TDC CPU555, SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010, SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010, SINAMICS DCM, SINAMICS DCP, SINAMICS G110M V4.7 PN Control Unit, SINAMICS G120 V4.7 PN Control Unit (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS G130 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS G150 Control Unit, SINAMICS GH150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS GL150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS GM150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS S110 Control Unit, SINAMICS S120 V4.7 Control Unit (incl. SIPLUS variants), SINAMICS S150 Control Unit, SINAMICS SL150 V4.7 Control Unit, SINAMICS SM120 V4.7 Control Unit, SINUMERIK 828D, SINUMERIK 840D sl, SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU, SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU, SIPLUS NET PN/PN Coupler, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP, SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP. Affected devices improperly handle large amounts of specially crafted UDP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a denial-of-service condition. | |||||
CVE-2019-13940 | 1 Siemens | 47 S7-1200 Cpu 1211c, S7-1200 Cpu 1211c Firmware, S7-1200 Cpu 1212c and 44 more | 2023-01-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM154-8FX PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V4.1), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010 (All versions), SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010 (All versions), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8 PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS ET 200S IM151-8F PN/DP CPU (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (All versions < V3.X.17). Affected devices contain a vulnerability that could cause a denial of service condition of the web server by sending specially crafted HTTP requests to ports 80/tcp and 443/tcp. Beyond the web service, no other functions or interfaces are affected by the denial of service condition. | |||||
CVE-2022-3994 | 1 Authenticator Project | 1 Authenticator | 2023-01-09 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
The Authenticator WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 does not prevent subscribers from updating a site's feed access token, which may deny other users access to the functionality in certain configurations. | |||||
CVE-2019-25072 | 1 Tendermint | 1 Tendermint | 2023-01-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Due to support of Gzip compression in request bodies, as well as a lack of limiting response body sizes, a malicious server can cause a client to consume a significant amount of system resources, which may be used as a denial of service vector. | |||||
CVE-2022-3064 | 1 Yaml Project | 1 Yaml | 2023-01-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Parsing malicious or large YAML documents can consume excessive amounts of CPU or memory. | |||||
CVE-2022-4767 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2023-01-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
Denial of Service in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1. |