Total
4240 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-2816 | 4 Apple, Fedoraproject, Google and 1 more | 5 Iphone Os, Safari, Fedora and 2 more | 2021-11-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The implementation of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) in WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 4.0.4 and Google Chrome before 3.0.195.33, includes certain custom HTTP headers in the OPTIONS request during cross-origin operations with preflight, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a crafted web page. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23686 | 1 Ayacms Project | 1 Ayacms | 2021-11-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AyaCMS 3.1.2 allows attackers to change an administrators password or other unspecified impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11203 | 1 Tibco | 2 Activematrix Business Process Management, Silver Fabric Enabler | 2021-11-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The workspace client, openspace client, app development client, and REST API of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Distribution for TIBCO Silver Fabric, and TIBCO Silver Fabric Enabler for ActiveMatrix BPM contain cross site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery vulnerabilities. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM: versions up to and including 4.2.0, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Distribution for TIBCO Silver Fabric: versions up to and including 4.2.0, and TIBCO Silver Fabric Enabler for ActiveMatrix BPM: versions up to and including 1.4.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35491 | 1 Wowza | 1 Streaming Engine | 2021-11-05 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wowza Streaming Engine through 4.8.11+5 allows a remote attacker to delete a user account via the /enginemanager/server/user/delete.htm userName parameter. The application does not implement a CSRF token for the GET request. This issue was resolved in Wowza Streaming Engine release 4.8.14. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34773 | 1 Cisco | 2 Unified Communications Manager, Unified Communications Manager Im And Presence Service | 2021-11-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), and Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (Unified CM IM&P) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user. These actions could include modifying the device configuration and deleting (but not creating) user accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-21139 | 1 Ec Cloud E-commerce System Project | 1 Ec Cloud E-commerce System | 2021-11-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| EC Cloud E-Commerce System v1.3 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily add admin accounts via /admin.html?do=user&act=add. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42097 | 2 Debian, Gnu | 2 Debian Linux, Mailman | 2021-11-05 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.0 HIGH |
| GNU Mailman before 2.1.35 may allow remote Privilege Escalation. A csrf_token value is not specific to a single user account. An attacker can obtain a value within the context of an unprivileged user account, and then use that value in a CSRF attack against an admin (e.g., for account takeover). | |||||
| CVE-2020-11060 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2021-11-04 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In GLPI before 9.4.6, an attacker can execute system commands by abusing the backup functionality. Theoretically, this vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker without a valid account by using a CSRF. Due to the difficulty of the exploitation, the attack is only conceivable by an account having Maintenance privileges and the right to add WIFI networks. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. | |||||
| CVE-2021-29888 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Aix, Infosphere Information Server, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2021-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 207123. | |||||
| CVE-2015-10001 | 1 Wp-stats Project | 1 Wp-stats | 2021-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The WP-Stats WordPress plugin before 2.52 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, and did not escape some of them when outputting them, allowing attacker to make logged in high privilege users change them and set Cross-Site Scripting payloads | |||||
| CVE-2020-36504 | 1 Wp-pro-quiz Project | 1 Wp-pro-quiz | 2021-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The WP-Pro-Quiz WordPress plugin through 0.37 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting a quiz, which could allow an attacker to make a logged in admin delete arbitrary quiz on the blog | |||||
| CVE-2020-36505 | 1 Delete All Comments Easily Project | 1 Delete All Comments Easily | 2021-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Delete All Comments Easily WordPress plugin through 1.3 is lacking Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) checks, which could result in an unauthenticated attacker making a logged in admin delete all comments from the blog. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24572 | 1 Wpplugin | 1 Accept Donations With Paypal | 2021-11-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Accept Donations with PayPal WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 provides a function to create donation buttons which are internally stored as posts. The deletion of a button is not CSRF protected and there is no control to check if the deleted post was a button post. As a result, an attacker could make logged in admins delete arbitrary posts | |||||
| CVE-2021-24799 | 1 Tipsandtricks-hq | 1 Far Future Expiry Header | 2021-11-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Far Future Expiry Header WordPress plugin before 1.5 does not have CSRF check when saving its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3901 | 1 Firefly-iii | 1 Firefly Iii | 2021-11-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) | |||||
| CVE-2021-41176 | 1 Pterodactyl | 1 Panel | 2021-10-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Pterodactyl is an open-source game server management panel built with PHP 7, React, and Go. In affected versions of Pterodactyl a malicious user can trigger a user logout if a signed in user visits a malicious website that makes a request to the Panel's sign-out endpoint. This requires a targeted attack against a specific Panel instance, and serves only to sign a user out. **No user details are leaked, nor is any user data affected, this is simply an annoyance at worst.** This is fixed in version 1.6.3. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3900 | 1 Firefly-iii | 1 Firefly Iii | 2021-10-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| firefly-iii is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) | |||||
| CVE-2019-10199 | 1 Redhat | 1 Keycloak | 2021-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20120 | 1 Commscope | 2 Arris Surfboard Sb8200, Arris Surfboard Sb8200 Firmware | 2021-10-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The administration web interface for the Arris Surfboard SB8200 lacks any protections against cross-site request forgery attacks. This means that an attacker could make configuration changes (such as changing the administrative password) without the consent of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34743 | 1 Cisco | 1 Webex Meetings | 2021-10-25 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the application integration feature of Cisco Webex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to authorize an external application to integrate with and access a user's account without that user's express consent. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) tokens. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a targeted user who is currently authenticated to Cisco Webex Software to follow a link designed to pass malicious input to the Cisco Webex Software application authorization interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause Cisco Webex Software to authorize an application on the user's behalf without the express consent of the user, possibly allowing external applications to read data from that user's profile. | |||||