Total
4240 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-15516 | 1 Netapp | 1 Snapcenter Server | 2017-12-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| NetApp SnapCenter Server versions 1.1 through 2.x are susceptible to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could be used to cause an unintended authenticated action in the user interface. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11876 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Project Server, Sharepoint Enterprise Server | 2017-11-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Project Server and Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 allow an attacker to use cross-site forgery to read content that they are not authorized to read, use the victim's identity to take actions on the web application on behalf of the victim, such as change permissions and delete content, and inject malicious content in the browser of the victim, aka "Microsoft Project Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability". | |||||
| CVE-2017-16563 | 1 Grandstream | 2 Ht802, Ht802 Firmware | 2017-11-27 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Basic Settings screen on Vonage (Grandstream) HT802 devices allows attackers to modify settings, related to cgi-bin/update. | |||||
| CVE-2017-16565 | 1 Grandstream | 2 Ht802, Ht802 Firmware | 2017-11-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /cgi-bin/login on Vonage (Grandstream) HT802 devices allows attackers to authenticate a user via the login screen using the default password of 123 and submit arbitrary requests. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1300 | 1 Ibm | 1 Openpages Grc Platform | 2017-11-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM OpenPages GRC Platform 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 125162. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5372 | 1 Netapp | 1 Snap Creator Framework | 2017-11-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3.0P1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2017-11-15 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4568 | 1 Letodms Project | 1 Letodms | 2017-11-14 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6033 | 1 Ibm | 2 Tivoli Storage Flashcopy Manager For Vmware, Tivoli Storage Manager For Virtual Environments Data Protection For Vmware | 2017-11-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Virtual Environments 7.1 (VMware) is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 1995545. | |||||
| CVE-2017-15645 | 1 Webmin | 1 Webmin | 2017-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| CSRF exists in Webmin 1.850. By sending a GET request to at/create_job.cgi containing dir=/&cmd= in the URI, an attacker to execute arbitrary commands. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3709 | 1 Keycloak | 1 Keycloak | 2017-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The org.keycloak.services.resources.SocialResource.callback method in JBoss KeyCloak before 1.0.3.Final allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by leveraging lack of CSRF protection. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5731 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2017-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wp-admin/post.php in WordPress before 4.2.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that lock a post, and consequently cause a denial of service (editing blockage), via a get-post-lock action. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6635 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2017-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_wp_compression_test function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the script compression option. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5489 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2017-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress before 4.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors involving a Flash file upload. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5492 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2017-11-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the widget-editing accessibility-mode feature in WordPress before 4.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that perform a widgets-access action, related to wp-admin/includes/class-wp-screen.php and wp-admin/widgets.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5789 | 1 Jantek | 2 Jtc-200, Jtc-200 Firmware | 2017-11-03 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| A Cross-site Request Forgery issue was discovered in JanTek JTC-200, all versions. An attacker could perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, provided the victim has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Subversion | 2017-11-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2017-11-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4430 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2017-10-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Apache Struts 2 2.3.20 through 2.3.28.1 mishandles token validation, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1218 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2017-10-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123858. | |||||