Total
309 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1010161 | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt Project | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| perl-CRYPT-JWT 0.022 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: bypass authentication. The component is: JWT.pm for JWT security token, line 614 in _decode_jws(). The attack vector is: network connectivity(crafting user-controlled input to bypass authentication). The fixed version is: 0.023. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010263 | 1 Perl Crypt\ | 1 \ | 2020-08-24 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Perl Crypt::JWT prior to 0.023 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: allow attackers to bypass authentication by providing a token by crafting with hmac(). The component is: JWT.pm, line 614. The attack vector is: network connectivity. The fixed version is: after commit b98a59b42ded9f9e51b2560410106207c2152d6c. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10575 | 1 Qualcomm | 6 Sda845, Sda845 Firmware, Sdm845 and 3 more | 2020-08-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Wlan binary which is not signed with OEMs RoT is working on secure device without authentication failure in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in SDA845, SDM845, SDM850 | |||||
| CVE-2019-5592 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios Ips Engine | 2020-08-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Multiple padding oracle vulnerabilities (Zombie POODLE, GOLDENDOODLE, OpenSSL 0-length) in the CBC padding implementation of FortiOS IPS engine version 5.000 to 5.006, 4.000 to 4.036, 4.200 to 4.219, 3.547 and below, when configured with SSL Deep Inspection policies and with the IPS sensor enabled, may allow an attacker to decipher TLS connections going through the FortiGate via monitoring the traffic in a Man-in-the-middle position. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5299 | 1 Huawei | 2 Hima-al00b, Hima-al00b Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Huawei mobile phones Hima-AL00Bhave with Versions earlier than HMA-AL00C00B175 have a signature verification bypass vulnerability. Attackers can induce users to install malicious applications. Due to a defect in the signature verification logic, the malicious applications can invoke specific interface to execute malicious code. A successful exploit may result in the execution of arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1464 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2020-08-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists when Windows incorrectly validates file signatures, aka 'Windows Spoofing Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2014-1498 | 5 Mozilla, Opensuse, Opensuse Project and 2 more | 8 Firefox, Seamonkey, Opensuse and 5 more | 2020-08-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The crypto.generateCRMFRequest method in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.25 does not properly validate a certain key type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via vectors that trigger generation of a key that supports the Elliptic Curve ec-dual-use algorithm. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15827 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Toolbox | 2020-08-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In JetBrains ToolBox version 1.17 before 1.17.6856, the set of signature verifications omitted the jetbrains-toolbox.exe file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15957 | 1 Dp3t-backend-software Development Kit Project | 1 Dp3t-backend-software Development Kit | 2020-08-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in DP3T-Backend-SDK before 1.1.1 for Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Proximity Tracing (DP3T). When it is configured to check JWT before uploading/publishing keys, it is possible to skip the signature check by providing a JWT token with alg=none. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10608 | 1 Osisoft | 9 Pi Api, Pi Buffer Subsystem, Pi Connector and 6 more | 2020-08-05 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In OSIsoft PI System multiple products and versions, a local attacker can plant a binary and bypass a code integrity check for loading PI System libraries. This exploitation can target another local user of PI System software on the computer to escalate privilege and result in unauthorized information disclosure, deletion, or modification. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7064 | 1 Pritunl | 1 Pritunl-client | 2020-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in pritunl-client before version 1.0.1116.6. A lack of signature verification leads to sensitive information leakage | |||||
| CVE-2020-9226 | 1 Huawei | 2 P30, P30 Firmware | 2020-07-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| HUAWEI P30 with versions earlier than 10.1.0.135(C00E135R2P11) have an improper signature verification vulnerability. The system does not improper check signature of specific software package, an attacker may exploit this vulnerability to load a crafted software package to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15091 | 1 Tendermint | 1 Tendermint | 2020-07-08 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| TenderMint from version 0.33.0 and before version 0.33.6 allows block proposers to include signatures for the wrong block. This may happen naturally if you start a network, have it run for some time and restart it (**without changing chainID**). A malicious block proposer (even with a minimal amount of stake) can use this vulnerability to completely halt the network. This issue is fixed in Tendermint 0.33.6 which checks all the signatures are for the block with 2/3+ majority before creating a commit. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2021 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2020-07-06 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled and the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is disabled (unchecked), improper verification of signatures in PAN-OS SAML authentication enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker to access protected resources. The attacker must have network access to the vulnerable server to exploit this vulnerability. This issue affects PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.3; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.9; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.15, and all versions of PAN-OS 8.0 (EOL). This issue does not affect PAN-OS 7.1. This issue cannot be exploited if SAML is not used for authentication. This issue cannot be exploited if the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is enabled (checked) in the SAML Identity Provider Server Profile. Resources that can be protected by SAML-based single sign-on (SSO) authentication are: GlobalProtect Gateway, GlobalProtect Portal, GlobalProtect Clientless VPN, Authentication and Captive Portal, PAN-OS next-generation firewalls (PA-Series, VM-Series) and Panorama web interfaces, Prisma Access In the case of GlobalProtect Gateways, GlobalProtect Portal, Clientless VPN, Captive Portal, and Prisma Access, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected servers can gain access to protected resources if allowed by configured authentication and Security policies. There is no impact on the integrity and availability of the gateway, portal or VPN server. An attacker cannot inspect or tamper with sessions of regular users. In the worst case, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). In the case of PAN-OS and Panorama web interfaces, this issue allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the PAN-OS or Panorama web interfaces to log in as an administrator and perform administrative actions. In the worst-case scenario, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). If the web interfaces are only accessible to a restricted management network, then the issue is lowered to a CVSS Base Score of 9.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious attempts to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14199 | 1 Satoshilabs | 4 Trezor Model T, Trezor Model T Firmware, Trezor One and 1 more | 2020-06-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| BIP-143 in the Bitcoin protocol specification mishandles the signing of a Segwit transaction, which allows attackers to trick a user into making two signatures in certain cases, potentially leading to a huge transaction fee. NOTE: this affects all hardware wallets. It was fixed in 1.9.1 for the Trezor One and 2.3.1 for the Trezor Model T. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13895 | 1 P5-crypt-perl Project | 1 P5-crypt-perl | 2020-06-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Crypt::Perl::ECDSA in the Crypt::Perl (aka p5-Crypt-Perl) module before 0.32 for Perl fails to verify correct ECDSA signatures when r and s are small and when s = 1. This happens when using the curve secp256r1 (prime256v1). This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact if an attacker wishes to use public r and s values when guessing whether signature verification will fail. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3209 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2020-06-10 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in software image verification in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, physical attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to an improper check on the area of code that manages the verification of the digital signatures of system image files during the initial boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by loading unsigned software on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on the targeted device. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20834 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Phantompdf | 2020-06-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF before 8.3.10. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13810 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2020-06-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 9.7.2. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13803 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2020-06-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PhantomPDF Mac and Foxit Reader for Mac before 4.0. It allows signature validation bypass via a modified file or a file with non-standard signatures. | |||||