Total
821 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-5102 | 1 Openwrt | 1 Openwrt | 2022-06-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5101 | 1 Openwrt | 1 Openwrt | 2022-06-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable information leak vulnerability exists in the ustream-ssl library of OpenWrt, versions 18.06.4 and 15.05.1. When connecting to a remote server, the server's SSL certificate is checked but no action is taken when the certificate is invalid. An attacker could exploit this behavior by performing a man-in-the-middle attack, providing any certificate, leading to the theft of all the data sent by the client during the first request. After an SSL connection is initialized via _ustream_ssl_init, and after any data (e.g. the client's HTTP request) is written to the stream using ustream_printf, the code eventually enters the function __ustream_ssl_poll, which is used to dispatch the read/write events | |||||
| CVE-2022-32563 | 1 Couchbase | 1 Sync Gateway | 2022-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2913 | 1 Meetcircle | 2 Circle With Disney, Circle With Disney Firmware | 2022-06-13 | 2.6 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable vulnerability exists in the filtering functionality of Circle with Disney. SSL certificates for specific domain names can cause the Bluecoat library to accept a different certificate than intended. An attacker can host an HTTPS server with this certificate to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26491 | 2 Debian, Pidgin | 2 Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2022-06-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Pidgin before 2.14.9. A remote attacker who can spoof DNS responses can redirect a client connection to a malicious server. The client will perform TLS certificate verification of the malicious domain name instead of the original XMPP service domain, allowing the attacker to take over control over the XMPP connection and to obtain user credentials and all communication content. This is similar to CVE-2022-24968. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29082 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Networker | 2022-06-08 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Dell EMC NetWorker versions 19.1.x, 19.1.0.x, 19.1.1.x, 19.2.x, 19.2.0.x, 19.2.1.x 19.3.x, 19.3.0.x, 19.4.x, 19.4.0.x, 19.5.x,19.5.0.x, 19.6 and 19.6.0.1 and 19.6.0.2 contain an Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Rabbitmq port 5671 which could allow remote attackers to spoof certificates. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29222 | 1 Pion | 1 Dtls | 2022-06-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pion DTLS is a Go implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security. Prior to version 2.1.5, a DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it. This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to version 2.1.5. Users should upgrade to version 2.1.5 to receive a patch. There are currently no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26766 | 1 Apple | 6 Ipados, Iphone Os, Mac Os X and 3 more | 2022-06-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A certificate parsing issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in tvOS 15.5, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5, Security Update 2022-004 Catalina, watchOS 8.6, macOS Big Sur 11.6.6, macOS Monterey 12.4. A malicious app may be able to bypass signature validation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-4015 | 1 Webroot | 1 Brightcloud | 2022-06-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An exploitable vulnerability exists in the HTTP client functionality of the Webroot BrightCloud SDK. The configuration of the HTTP client does not enforce a secure connection by default, resulting in a failure to validate TLS certificates. An attacker could impersonate a remote BrightCloud server to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22306 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2022-06-06 | 2.9 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.10, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, 7.0.0 may allow a network adjacent and unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the FortiGate and some peers such as private SDNs and external cloud platforms. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22138 | 1 Elastic | 1 Logstash | 2022-06-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In Logstash versions after 6.4.0 and before 6.8.15 and 7.12.0 a TLS certificate validation flaw was found in the monitoring feature. When specifying a trusted server CA certificate Logstash would not properly verify the certificate returned by the monitoring server. This could result in a man in the middle style attack against the Logstash monitoring data. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2836 | 2 Debian, Freerdp | 2 Debian Linux, Freerdp | 2022-06-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable denial of service vulnerability exists within the reading of proprietary server certificates in FreeRDP 2.0.0-beta1+android11. A specially crafted challenge packet can cause the program termination leading to a denial of service condition. An attacker can compromise the server or use man in the middle to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25636 | 2 Fedoraproject, Libreoffice | 2 Fedora, Libreoffice | 2022-06-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20230 | 1 Stunnel | 1 Stunnel | 2022-06-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in stunnel before 5.57, where it improperly validates client certificates when it is configured to use both redirect and verifyChain options. This flaw allows an attacker with a certificate signed by a Certificate Authority, which is not the one accepted by the stunnel server, to access the tunneled service instead of being redirected to the address specified in the redirect option. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2013-10001 | 1 Htc | 5 Mail, One Sv, One X and 2 more | 2022-06-01 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in HTC One/Sense 4.x. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the certification validation of the mail client. An exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22787 | 1 Zoom | 1 Meetings | 2022-05-27 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.10.0 fails to properly validate the hostname during a server switch request. This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to trick an unsuspecting users client to connect to a malicious server when attempting to use Zoom services. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8156 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nextcloud | 2 Fedora, Nextcloud Mail | 2022-05-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| A missing verification of the TLS host in Nextcloud Mail 1.1.3 allowed a man in the middle attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27768 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Verse | 2022-05-24 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Using the ability to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack, which indicates a lack of hostname verification, sensitive account information was able to be intercepted. In this specific scenario, the application's network traffic was intercepted using a proxy server set up in 'transparent' mode while a certificate with an invalid hostname was active. The Android application was found to have hostname verification issues during the server setup and login flows; however, the application did not process requests post-login. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8356 | 1 Microsoft | 13 .net Core, .net Framework, .net Framework Developer Pack and 10 more | 2022-05-23 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when Microsoft .NET Framework components do not correctly validate certificates, aka ".NET Framework Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." This affects .NET Framework 4.7.2, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.2, ASP.NET Core 1.1, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5.2, ASP.NET Core 2.0, ASP.NET Core 1.0, .NET Core 1.1, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5.1, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2, .NET Core 1.0, .NET Core 2.0, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6/4.6.1/4.6.2/4.7/4.7.1/4.7.1/4.7.2, Microsoft .NET Framework 4.7.2. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21836 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2022-05-23 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Certificate Spoofing Vulnerability. | |||||