Total
821 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-4264 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2023-02-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 WinCollect could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information by spoofing a trusted entity using man in the middle techniques due to not validating or incorrectly validating a certificate. IBM X-Force ID: 160072. | |||||
CVE-2020-14039 | 2 Golang, Opensuse | 2 Go, Leap | 2023-02-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
In Go before 1.13.13 and 1.14.x before 1.14.5, Certificate.Verify may lack a check on the VerifyOptions.KeyUsages EKU requirements (if VerifyOptions.Roots equals nil and the installation is on Windows). Thus, X.509 certificate verification is incomplete. | |||||
CVE-2019-4150 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Access Manager | 2023-01-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
IBM Security Access Manager 9.0.1 through 9.0.6 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-Force ID: 158510. | |||||
CVE-2015-8960 | 7 Apple, Google, Ietf and 4 more | 18 Safari, Chrome, Transport Layer Security and 15 more | 2023-01-30 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue. | |||||
CVE-2020-12421 | 2 Canonical, Mozilla | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 1 more | 2023-01-30 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
When performing add-on updates, certificate chains terminating in non-built-in-roots were rejected (even if they were legitimately added by an administrator.) This could have caused add-ons to become out-of-date silently without notification to the user. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 68.10, Firefox < 78, and Thunderbird < 68.10.0. | |||||
CVE-2017-2800 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-01-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a single out of bounds byte overwrite in wolfSSL through 3.10.2 resulting in potential certificate validation vulnerabilities, denial of service and possible remote code execution. In order to trigger this vulnerability, the attacker needs to supply a malicious x509 certificate to either a server or a client application using this library. | |||||
CVE-2020-17366 | 1 Nlnetlabs | 1 Routinator | 2023-01-27 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate Revocation List files from the RPKI relying party's view. | |||||
CVE-2019-17560 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 2 Netbeans, Graalvm | 2023-01-27 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
The "Apache NetBeans" autoupdate system does not validate SSL certificates and hostnames for https based downloads. This allows an attacker to intercept downloads of autoupdates and modify the download, potentially injecting malicious code. “Apache NetBeans" versions up to and including 11.2 are affected by this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2023-23690 | 1 Dell | 1 Cloud Mobility For Dell Emc Storage | 2023-01-27 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
Cloud Mobility for Dell EMC Storage, versions 1.3.0.X and below contains an Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability. A threat actor does not need any specific privileges to potentially exploit this vulnerability. An attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on encrypted communications from Cloud Mobility to Cloud Storage devices. Exploitation could lead to the compromise of secret and sensitive information, cloud storage connection downtime, and the integrity of the connection to the Cloud devices. | |||||
CVE-2020-14981 | 1 Vipre | 1 Password Vault | 2023-01-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
The ThreatTrack VIPRE Password Vault app through 1.100.1090 for iOS has Missing SSL Certificate Validation. | |||||
CVE-2020-14980 | 1 Sophos | 1 Sophos Secure Email | 2023-01-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
The Sophos Secure Email application through 3.9.4 for Android has Missing SSL Certificate Validation. | |||||
CVE-2022-33684 | 1 Apache | 1 Pulsar | 2023-01-26 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
The Apache Pulsar C++ Client does not verify peer TLS certificates when making HTTPS calls for the OAuth2.0 Client Credential Flow, even when tlsAllowInsecureConnection is disabled via configuration. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack and intercept and/or modify the GET request that is sent to the ClientCredentialFlow 'issuer url'. The intercepted credentials can be used to acquire authentication data from the OAuth2.0 server to then authenticate with an Apache Pulsar cluster. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack. The Apache Pulsar Python Client wraps the C++ client, so it is also vulnerable in the same way. This issue affects Apache Pulsar C++ Client and Python Client versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0 to 2.10.1; 2.6.4 and earlier. Any users running affected versions of the C++ Client or the Python Client should rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials, including client_id and client_secret. 2.7 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.7.5 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.8 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.8.4 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.9 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.9.3 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 2.10 C++ and Python Client users should upgrade to 2.10.2 and rotate vulnerable OAuth2.0 credentials. 3.0 C++ users are unaffected and 3.0 Python Client users will be unaffected when it is released. Any users running the C++ and Python Client for 2.6 or less should upgrade to one of the above patched versions. | |||||
CVE-2014-3394 | 1 Cisco | 11 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance, Asa 1000v Cloud Firewall and 8 more | 2023-01-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The Smart Call Home (SCH) implementation in Cisco ASA Software 8.2 before 8.2(5.50), 8.4 before 8.4(7.15), 8.6 before 8.6(1.14), 8.7 before 8.7(1.13), 9.0 before 9.0(4.8), and 9.1 before 9.1(5.1) allows remote attackers to bypass certificate validation via an arbitrary VeriSign certificate, aka Bug ID CSCun10916. | |||||
CVE-2021-29726 | 1 Ibm | 2 Secure External Authentication Server, Sterling Secure Proxy | 2023-01-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104. | |||||
CVE-2020-36477 | 1 Arm | 1 Mbed Tls | 2023-01-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. The verification of X.509 certificates when matching the expected common name (the cn argument of mbedtls_x509_crt_verify) with the actual certificate name is mishandled: when the subjecAltName extension is present, the expected name is compared to any name in that extension regardless of its type. This means that an attacker could impersonate a 4-byte or 16-byte domain by getting a certificate for the corresponding IPv4 or IPv6 address (this would require the attacker to control that IP address, though). | |||||
CVE-2022-42979 | 1 Rydesharing | 1 Ryde | 2023-01-11 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
Information disclosure due to an insecure hostname validation in the RYDE application 5.8.43 for Android and iOS allows attackers to take over an account via a deep link. | |||||
CVE-2020-36425 | 2 Arm, Debian | 2 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux | 2023-01-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.24.0. It incorrectly uses a revocationDate check when deciding whether to honor certificate revocation via a CRL. In some situations, an attacker can exploit this by changing the local clock. | |||||
CVE-2020-36478 | 3 Arm, Debian, Siemens | 14 Mbed Tls, Debian Linux, Logo\! Cmr2020 and 11 more | 2023-01-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS before 2.25.0 (and before 2.16.9 LTS and before 2.7.18 LTS). A NULL algorithm parameters entry looks identical to an array of REAL (size zero) and thus the certificate is considered valid. However, if the parameters do not match in any way, then the certificate should be considered invalid. | |||||
CVE-2021-30998 | 1 Apple | 2 Ipados, Iphone Os | 2023-01-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
A S/MIME issue existed in the handling of encrypted email. This issue was addressed with improved selection of the encryption certificate. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.2 and iPadOS 15.2. A sender's email address may be leaked when sending an S/MIME encrypted email using a certificate with more than one email address. | |||||
CVE-2020-9868 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Mac Os X and 2 more | 2023-01-09 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
A certificate validation issue existed when processing administrator added certificates. This issue was addressed with improved certificate validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 13.6 and iPadOS 13.6, macOS Catalina 10.15.6, tvOS 13.4.8, watchOS 6.2.8. An attacker may have been able to impersonate a trusted website using shared key material for an administrator added certificate. |