Total
9170 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-16845 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Qemu | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Qemu | 2020-09-10 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| hw/input/ps2.c in Qemu does not validate 'rptr' and 'count' values during guest migration, leading to out-of-bounds access. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2381 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 2 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Opensuse and 7 more | 2020-09-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Perl might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass the taint protection mechanism in a child process via duplicate environment variables in envp. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6887 | 1 Uclouvain | 1 Openjpeg | 2020-09-09 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenJPEG 1.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors that trigger NULL pointer dereferences, division-by-zero, and other errors. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6053 | 1 Uclouvain | 1 Openjpeg | 2020-09-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| OpenJPEG 1.5.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors that trigger a heap-based out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3507 | 1 Cisco | 16 8000p Ip Camera, 8000p Ip Camera Firmware, 8020 Ip Camera and 13 more | 2020-09-09 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco Discovery Protocol implementation for Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute code remotely or cause a reload of an affected IP camera. These vulnerabilities are due to missing checks when the IP cameras process a Cisco Discovery Protocol packet. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to the targeted IP camera. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code on the affected IP camera or cause it to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Note: Cisco Discovery Protocol is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). | |||||
| CVE-2020-3506 | 1 Cisco | 16 8000p Ip Camera, 8000p Ip Camera Firmware, 8020 Ip Camera and 13 more | 2020-09-09 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Cisco Discovery Protocol implementation for Cisco Video Surveillance 8000 Series IP Cameras could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute code remotely or cause a reload of an affected IP camera. These vulnerabilities are due to missing checks when the IP cameras process a Cisco Discovery Protocol packet. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol packet to the targeted IP camera. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code on the affected IP camera or cause it to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Note: Cisco Discovery Protocol is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). | |||||
| CVE-2020-13594 | 1 Espressif | 2 Esp-idf, Esp32 | 2020-09-08 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) controller implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.2 and earlier (for ESP32 devices) does not properly restrict the channel map field of the connection request packet on reception, allowing attackers in radio range to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted packet. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12670 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2020-09-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In ImageMagick 7.0.6-3, missing validation was found in coders/mat.c, leading to an assertion failure in the function DestroyImage in MagickCore/image.c, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13061 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2020-09-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In ImageMagick 7.0.6-5, a length-validation vulnerability was found in the function ReadPSDLayersInternal in coders/psd.c, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (ReadPSDImage memory exhaustion) via a crafted file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7526 | 1 Apc | 1 Powerchute | 2020-09-04 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists in PowerChute Business Edition (software V9.0.x and earlier) which could cause remote code execution when a script is executed during a shutdown event. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3338 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Guardium | 2020-09-04 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM InfoSphere Guardium 8.0, 8.01, and 8.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper restrictions on the create new user account functionality. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to create unprivileged user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 78286. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3767 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2020-09-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| ColdFusion versions ColdFusion 2016, and ColdFusion 2018 have an insufficient input validation vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to application-level denial-of-service (dos). | |||||
| CVE-2018-15960 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2020-09-04 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Adobe ColdFusion versions July 12 release (2018.0.0.310739), Update 6 and earlier, and Update 14 and earlier have a use of a component with a known vulnerability vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary file overwrite. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1115 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2020-09-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Adobe ColdFusion 10 before Update 19, 11 before Update 8, and 2016 before Update 1 mishandles wildcards in name fields of X.509 certificates, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5255 | 2 Adobe, Hp | 4 Coldfusion, Livecycle Data Services, Xp7 Command View Advanced Edition and 1 more | 2020-09-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Adobe BlazeDS, as used in ColdFusion 10 before Update 18 and 11 before Update 7 and LiveCycle Data Services 3.0.x before 3.0.0.354175, 3.1.x before 3.1.0.354180, 4.5.x before 4.5.1.354177, 4.6.2.x before 4.6.2.354178, and 4.7.x before 4.7.0.354178, allows remote attackers to send HTTP traffic to intranet servers via a crafted XML document, related to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13465 | 1 Gigadevice | 2 Gd32f103, Gd32f103 Firmware | 2020-09-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| The security protection in Gigadevice GD32F103 devices allows physical attackers to redirect the control flow and execute arbitrary code via the debug interface. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0156 | 1 Cisco | 149 Catalyst 2960-plus 24lc-l, Catalyst 2960-plus 24lc-s, Catalyst 2960-plus 24pc-l and 146 more | 2020-09-02 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Smart Install feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of packet data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted packet to an affected device on TCP port 4786. Only Smart Install client switches are affected. Cisco devices that are configured as a Smart Install director are not affected by this vulnerability. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd40673. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25059 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-09-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 software. A service crash may occur because of incorrect input validation. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200013 (July 2020). | |||||
| CVE-2020-25063 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-09-01 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 software. An application crash can occur because of incorrect application-level input validation. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200018 (July 2020). | |||||
| CVE-2018-15411 | 1 Cisco | 4 Webex Business Suite 32, Webex Business Suite 33, Webex Meetings Online and 1 more | 2020-09-01 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Webex Network Recording Player for Microsoft Windows and the Cisco Webex Player for Microsoft Windows could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected system. The vulnerability exist because the affected software improperly validates Advanced Recording Format (ARF) and Webex Recording Format (WRF) files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a user a malicious ARF or WRF file via a link or an email attachment and persuading the user to open the file by using the affected software. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. | |||||