Total
4813 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-3459 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Linux and 1 more | 16 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel and 13 more | 2022-04-22 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
A heap address information leak while using L2CAP_GET_CONF_OPT was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.1-rc1. | |||||
CVE-2019-18849 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2022-04-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
In tnef before 1.4.18, an attacker may be able to write to the victim's .ssh/authorized_keys file via an e-mail message with a crafted winmail.dat application/ms-tnef attachment, because of a heap-based buffer over-read involving strdup. | |||||
CVE-2021-40424 | 1 Webroot | 1 Secureanywhere | 2022-04-22 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the IOCTL GetProcessCommand and B_03 of Webroot Secure Anywhere 21.4. A specially-crafted executable can lead to denial of service. An attacker can issue an ioctl to trigger this vulnerability. An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the IOCTL GetProcessCommand and B_03 of Webroot Secure Anywhere 21.4. The GetProcessCommandLine IOCTL request could cause an out-of-bounds read in the device driver WRCore_x64. An attacker can issue an ioctl to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2020-35653 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Python | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Pillow | 2022-04-22 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
In Pillow before 8.1.0, PcxDecode has a buffer over-read when decoding a crafted PCX file because the user-supplied stride value is trusted for buffer calculations. | |||||
CVE-2020-6447 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Google and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Chrome and 2 more | 2022-04-22 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
Inappropriate implementation in developer tools in Google Chrome prior to 81.0.4044.92 allowed a remote attacker who had convinced the user to use devtools to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
CVE-2020-24506 | 2 Intel, Siemens | 220 B360, B365, B460 and 217 more | 2022-04-22 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
Out of bound read in a subsystem in the Intel(R) CSME versions before 12.0.81, 13.0.47, 13.30.17, 14.1.53 and 14.5.32 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | |||||
CVE-2020-12360 | 3 Intel, Netapp, Siemens | 552 Bios, Core I3-l13g4, Core I5-l16g7 and 549 more | 2022-04-22 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
Out of bounds read in the firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2022-27524 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Dwg Trueview | 2022-04-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
An out-of-bounds read can be exploited in Autodesk TrueView 2022 may lead to an exposure of sensitive information or a crash through using a maliciously crafted DWG file as an Input. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | |||||
CVE-2022-27523 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Dwg Trueview | 2022-04-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
A buffer over-read can be exploited in Autodesk TrueView 2022 may lead to an exposure of sensitive information or a crash through using a maliciously crafted DWG file as an Input. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | |||||
CVE-2021-40425 | 1 Webroot | 1 Secureanywhere | 2022-04-21 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the IOCTL GetProcessCommand and B_03 of Webroot Secure Anywhere 21.4. A specially-crafted executable can lead to denial of service. An attacker can issue an ioctl to trigger this vulnerability. An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the IOCTL GetProcessCommand and B_03 of Webroot Secure Anywhere 21.4. An IOCTL_B03 request with specific invalid data causes a similar issue in the device driver WRCore_x64. An attacker can issue an ioctl to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2022-21202 | 1 Fujielectric | 2 Alpha5 Smart Loader, Alpha5 Smart Loader Firmware | 2022-04-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
The affected product is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read, which may result in disclosure of sensitive information. | |||||
CVE-2017-7668 | 6 Apache, Apple, Debian and 3 more | 13 Http Server, Mac Os X, Debian Linux and 10 more | 2022-04-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
The HTTP strict parsing changes added in Apache httpd 2.2.32 and 2.4.24 introduced a bug in token list parsing, which allows ap_find_token() to search past the end of its input string. By maliciously crafting a sequence of request headers, an attacker may be able to cause a segmentation fault, or to force ap_find_token() to return an incorrect value. | |||||
CVE-2021-39809 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2022-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In avrc_ctrl_pars_vendor_rsp of avrc_pars_ct.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10 Android-11 Android-12 Android-12LAndroid ID: A-205837191 | |||||
CVE-2016-8334 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 1 Reader | 2022-04-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
A large out-of-bounds read on the heap vulnerability in Foxit PDF Reader can potentially be abused for information disclosure. Combined with another vulnerability, it can be used to leak heap memory layout and in bypassing ASLR. | |||||
CVE-2022-24383 | 1 Fujielectric | 2 Alpha5 Smart Loader, Alpha5 Smart Loader Firmware | 2022-04-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
The affected product is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read, which may result in code execution | |||||
CVE-2017-2806 | 1 Lexmark | 1 Perceptive Document Filters | 2022-04-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
An exploitable arbitrary read exists in the XLS parsing of the Lexmark Perspective Document Filters conversion functionality. A crafted XLS document can lead to a arbitrary read resulting in memory disclosure. The vulnerability was confirmed on versions 11.3.0.2228 and 11.3.0.2400 | |||||
CVE-2017-2801 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2022-04-19 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A programming error exists in a way Randombit Botan cryptographic library version 2.0.1 implements x500 string comparisons which could lead to certificate verification issues and abuse. A specially crafted X509 certificate would need to be delivered to the client or server application in order to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2017-14461 | 3 Debian, Dovecot, Ubuntu | 3 Debian Linux, Dovecot, Ubuntu | 2022-04-19 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
A specially crafted email delivered over SMTP and passed on to Dovecot by MTA can trigger an out of bounds read resulting in potential sensitive information disclosure and denial of service. In order to trigger this vulnerability, an attacker needs to send a specially crafted email message to the server. | |||||
CVE-2022-28661 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Femap | 2022-04-19 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2022.1.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted .NEU files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-15114) | |||||
CVE-2022-26380 | 1 Siemens | 48 Scalance X302-7eec, Scalance X302-7eec Firmware, Scalance X304-2fe and 45 more | 2022-04-19 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. Affected devices do not properly validate if a certain SNMP key exists. An attacker could use this to trigger a reboot of an affected device by requesting specific SNMP information from the device. |