Total
1596 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-28967 | 1 Flashget | 1 Flashget | 2021-10-28 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| FlashGet v1.9.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the 'current path directory' function. This vulnerability allows attackers to elevate local process privileges via overwriting the registers. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28963 | 2 Krylack, Microsoft | 2 Zip Password Recovery, Windows | 2021-10-28 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Passcovery Co. Ltd ZIP Password Recovery v3.70.69.0 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the decompress function. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28969 | 1 Aplixio | 1 Pdf Shapingup | 2021-10-28 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Aplioxio PDF ShapingUp 5.0.0.139 contains a buffer overflow which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted PDF file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36051 | 1 Adobe | 1 Xmp Toolkit Software Development Kit | 2021-10-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| XMP Toolkit SDK version 2020.1 (and earlier) is affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation requires user interaction in that a victim must open a specially-crafted .cpp file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30297 | 1 Qualcomm | 178 Apq8017, Apq8017 Firmware, Apq8053 and 175 more | 2021-10-26 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| Possible out of bound read due to improper validation of packet length while handling data transfer in VR service in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2021-1984 | 1 Qualcomm | 190 Apq8017, Apq8017 Firmware, Apq8053 and 187 more | 2021-10-26 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Possible buffer overflow due to improper validation of index value while processing the plugin block in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2021-1983 | 1 Qualcomm | 190 Apq8017, Apq8017 Firmware, Apq8053 and 187 more | 2021-10-26 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Possible buffer overflow due to improper handling of negative data length while processing write request in VR service in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2021-1966 | 1 Qualcomm | 130 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 127 more | 2021-10-26 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Possible buffer overflow due to lack of length check of source and destination buffer before copying in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music | |||||
| CVE-2020-21534 | 2 Debian, Xfig Project | 2 Debian Linux, Fig2dev | 2021-10-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| fig2dev 3.2.7b contains a global buffer overflow in the get_line function in read.c. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40239 | 1 Miniftpd Project | 1 Miniftpd | 2021-10-18 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in the latest version of Miniftpd in the do_retr function in ftpproto.c | |||||
| CVE-2020-27372 | 1 Brandy Project | 1 Brandy | 2021-10-18 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Brandy Basic V Interpreter 1.21 in the run_interpreter function. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38207 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2021-10-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_main.c in the Linux kernel before 5.12.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and lockup) by sending heavy network traffic for about ten minutes. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35977 | 1 Digi | 37 6350-sr, 6350-sr Firmware, Cm and 34 more | 2021-10-15 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Digi RealPort for Windows through 4.8.488.0. A buffer overflow exists in the handling of ADDP discovery response messages. This could result in arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41794 | 1 Open5gs | 1 Open5gs | 2021-10-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ogs_fqdn_parse in Open5GS 1.0.0 through 2.3.3 inappropriately trusts a client-supplied length value, leading to a buffer overflow. The attacker can send a PFCP Session Establishment Request with "internet" as the PDI Network Instance. The first character is interpreted as a length value to be used in a memcpy call. The destination buffer is only 100 bytes long on the stack. Then, 'i' gets interpreted as 105 bytes to copy from the source buffer to the destination buffer. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34776 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34777 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34775 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34778 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 2.9 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34779 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.9 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34780 | 1 Cisco | 32 Business 220-16p-2g, Business 220-16p-2g Firmware, Business 220-16t-2g and 29 more | 2021-10-14 | 7.9 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities exist in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) implementation for Cisco Small Business 220 Series Smart Switches. An unauthenticated, adjacent attacker could perform the following: Execute code on the affected device or cause it to reload unexpectedly Cause LLDP database corruption on the affected device For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. Note: LLDP is a Layer 2 protocol. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker must be in the same broadcast domain as the affected device (Layer 2 adjacent). Cisco has released firmware updates that address these vulnerabilities. | |||||