Show plain JSON{"cve": {"data_type": "CVE", "references": {"reference_data": [{"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=39461", "name": "20150625 Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA Default SSH Host Keys Vulnerability", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory"], "refsource": "CISCO"}, {"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150625-ironport", "name": "20150625 Multiple Default SSH Keys Vulnerabilities in Cisco Virtual WSA, ESA, and SMA", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory"], "refsource": "CISCO"}, {"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75418", "name": "75418", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry"], "refsource": "BID"}, {"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032726", "name": "1032726", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry"], "refsource": "SECTRACK"}, {"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032725", "name": "1032725", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry"], "refsource": "SECTRACK"}]}, "data_format": "MITRE", "description": {"description_data": [{"lang": "en", "value": "The remote-support feature on Cisco Web Security Virtual Appliance (WSAv), Email Security Virtual Appliance (ESAv), and Security Management Virtual Appliance (SMAv) devices before 2015-06-25 uses the same default SSH host keys across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of a private key from another installation, aka Bug IDs CSCus29681, CSCuu95676, and CSCuu96601."}]}, "problemtype": {"problemtype_data": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-310"}, {"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-200"}]}]}, "data_version": "4.0", "CVE_data_meta": {"ID": "CVE-2015-4217", "ASSIGNER": "psirt@cisco.com"}}, "impact": {"baseMetricV2": {"cvssV2": {"version": "2.0", "baseScore": 4.3, "accessVector": "NETWORK", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "authentication": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL"}, "severity": "MEDIUM", "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false}}, "publishedDate": "2015-06-26T10:59Z", "configurations": {"nodes": [{"children": [], "operator": "OR", "cpe_match": [{"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:8.4.0.0150:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:content_security_management_virtual_appliance:9.0.0.087:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:9.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:email_security_virtual_appliance:8.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:8.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}, {"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:web_security_virtual_appliance:7.7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true}]}], "CVE_data_version": "4.0"}, "lastModifiedDate": "2016-12-28T16:51Z"} 
